Courses If I struggled in chemistry, would I struggle in physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sophia_v
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chemistry Physics
AI Thread Summary
Deciding whether to take high school physics after struggling in chemistry involves evaluating individual strengths and interests. The discussion highlights that difficulties in one science subject do not necessarily predict challenges in another, as each discipline requires different skills. While chemistry often emphasizes memorization and specific calculations, physics may offer a more conceptual approach that could be engaging. The importance of math skills, particularly pre-calculus, is emphasized, as a solid foundation in mathematics is crucial for understanding physics concepts. It is suggested that taking physics could serve as motivation to improve math skills, but students should also consider their overall workload and readiness. Recognizing personal limitations early on can help in making informed decisions about pursuing rigorous courses.
sophia_v
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Should I take high school physics when I struggled (but wasn't a total flop) in my chemistry class?

Hello,

I am a high school student in a rigorous high school environment, and I really needed some insight.
I took a chemistry course, and the little math stuff that was required in chemistry was the hardest for me. I also have fulfilled the credits I need for science, however, I still wanted to take physics in my junior year (while I take pre-calculus).

I think the different things physics talk about would be very interesting to learn, but I'm already taking three other rigorous classes.

Should I take physics in my junior year or maybe wait a bit?

Thank you so much for your opinions and time!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To answer your question in the title first: This depends on why you struggled. E.g. laziness could be a reason to struggle everywhere. On the other hand are chemistry, physics, biology and mathematics three different fields with different skills required. Of course they are related and people who are good at one of them tend to be not complete idiots in the other. On the other hand, they are e.g. different in the amount of facts which have to be memorized.

I was pretty good in mathematics at school, but terribly failed in (organic) chemistry. I simply found no way to memorize all these carbon combinations, not to mention their properties. And although a very simple task, I really dislike the calculation of concentrations. I regularly confuse the total amount of the components with the total amount of the result, i.e. I simply don't know what is meant by a 5% solution: 100% + 5%, 95%+5%, 95.24%+4.76%, 95.25%.+4.75%. I have no clue and even less an idea how to memorize what the 5% refer to: before, after, componentwise, volume, weight, mass, molecules or whatever. So being bad at one doesn't necessarily mean being bad at another.

As to your second question: If you want to pursue a certain goal and it should happen, that you can't achieve it, then it's simple: the earlier you recognize it the better. But it has to be emphasized, that this does not mean, that there won't be obstacles and even less that they won't be possible to overcome. It means that normally the drop out rate in mathematics or natural sciences is highest at the end or within the first year, which in return means: if you'll make it through this year, your chances statistically will have improved. So it's probably better to find out early. Furthermore, physics can be a motivation to learn calculus and vice versa.
 
It's hard to understand physics without the math prerequisites. I'm a little surprised that you would be allowed to take physics before you have completed pre-calculus. Maybe I have a misconception about what a high school physics class would be like.
 
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...

Similar threads

Replies
43
Views
7K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top