Ratch
- 315
- 0
jim hardy,
Any capacitor imbued with energy is energized, and has a voltage across its terminals. All capacitors have the same net charge, specifically zero.
Why not?
That capacitor holds a voltage. Its net charge is the same before and after it is energtized and shorted.
Not by me.
Connected or not, any cap with a voltage across its terminals in energized.
Ratch
A capacitor in that AC transients paper is 'energized' when in use because it's connected to its mains. "Charged" would be the wrong term because it's charged, discharged, and recharged opposite polarity with every line cycle.
Any capacitor imbued with energy is energized, and has a voltage across its terminals. All capacitors have the same net charge, specifically zero.
Sorry, but Esmeralda doesn't sound very credible.
Why not?
In my background, to "Charge" a capacitor implies to connect it to a source of DC and allow charge(Coulombs) to accumulate per Q = C*V . I do that sometimes just to see if it holds charge, ie checking its insulation resistance.
The energy stored is 1/2 C*V^2 and sometimes i'll short its leads and estimate from size of the spark whether its capacity seems intact. An analog meter is real handy for that test, observe how fast the cap discharges.
That capacitor holds a voltage. Its net charge is the same before and after it is energtized and shorted.
So given my background i was a mite puzzled by what appeared to be use of the terms interchangeably.
Not by me.
A cap that is charged has energy stored in its dielectric, but i was taught to call it charged. because it may not be connected to a power source anymore. Be careful when picking up capacitors...
One that's "energized" is definitely connected to a power source.
Connected or not, any cap with a voltage across its terminals in energized.
Ratch