If two trains traveling at 0.5c collide head on

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter CombustionMan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Head Trains
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the hypothetical scenario of two trains traveling towards each other at 0.5c and the implications of their collision. Participants explore the relativistic effects on velocity, energy, and the nature of motion at speeds approaching the speed of light, touching on concepts such as time dilation and the composition of velocities.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the outcome of a head-on collision between two trains moving at 0.5c, suggesting that relativistic effects would prevent a straightforward additive velocity scenario.
  • Another participant explains that at relativistic speeds, the relative velocity does not simply add up due to the effects of time and space dilation, leading to a maximum relative speed below c.
  • A formula for calculating the relative speed of two objects moving towards each other is presented, indicating that the speed is given by \(\frac{u + v}{1 + \frac{uv}{c^2}}\), with an example calculation showing that the relative speed is \(\frac{4}{5}c\) when both speeds are 0.5c.
  • Further discussion highlights that while speeds approach c, the effects of time and space dilation ensure that no mass can reach or exceed the speed of light.
  • One participant mentions practical applications of these relativistic effects, such as the synchronization issues with GPS satellites due to differences in gravitational fields and relative speeds.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the relativistic principles affecting the scenario, but there are nuances in understanding the implications of time and space dilation, as well as the specific calculations for relative velocities. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact nature of the collision's outcome.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the reliance on specific relativistic formulas and assumptions about the conditions of the trains and their velocities. The discussion does not resolve the complexities of energy release or the physical consequences of such a collision.

CombustionMan
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
What would happen? These two trains are on the same tracks moving at constant velocities towards each other (0.5c --> and <--0.5c I guess) so what would happen? Since all motion is relative and no mass can travel at the speed of light something else must happen instead of a light speed head-on collision, right? I'm just curious.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The difficulty is in accepting that unlike at low velocities, where two objects moving at say 60mph are additive and so the relative velocity is 120mph, at speeds approaching c this is not the case.

The most a mass object could achieve would be something approaching a relative speed of 1c. There would be a very large explosion though and a lot of energy would be produced.

The Lorentz transforms explain it but essentially at significant fractions of light speed, the dilation of time and space means that relative velocities are always below 1c.

\ \gamma = \frac{1}{ \sqrt{1 - { \frac{v^2}{c^2}}}}

Which leads to the composition of velocities equation:

Where 2 moving bodies are w and v

291bfd8042576ef4c34fb191693e72c0.png


Best way to imagine it is to try and understand what time and motion dilation means, distance and time are equivalently dilated by motions that approach significant fractions of c, so that the relative concerns mean that they are effectively traveling through time space that is becoming "stretched" and hence the relative motion of mass objects becomes more dilated as they near velocities approaching c until the dilation itself prevents anything with mass achieving this limit. Probably not a very good explanation but meh.
 
Last edited:
I think I understand, so since they are traveling through "stretched" time their relative velocities go below 1c?
 
The formula for the relative speeds of two objects moving toward each other with speeds (relative to a third observer) of u and v i s NOT "u+ v". The speed of each relative to the other will be
\frac{u+ v}{1+ \frac{uv}{c^2}}

In particular, if u= v= c/2, then the speed of either one relative to the other is
\frac{\frac{c}{2}+ \frac{c}{2}}{1+ \frac{\frac{c}{2}\frac{c}{2}}{c^2}}= \frac{\frac{c}{2}}{1+ \frac{1}{4}}= \frac{4}{5}c
 
CombustionMan said:
I think I understand, so since they are traveling through "stretched" time their relative velocities go below 1c?

Yup pretty much although it's stretched time and space, space-time. You can play with Ivy's equations yourself to show that speeds always approach c just by plugging some numbers in.

It's more interesting if you take the case of .999c and then you would imagine the relative velocities are 1.998c which is clearly impossible but again just plugging the numbers in the dilation effects conserve c as a limit.

Interestingly we can observe this with GPS satellites, since the gravitation in space is slightly lower than on Earth and the relative speeds although far slower than c become significant over time. Without adjustments they can go out of synch fairly significantly in quite short periods of time. So to adjust for it they lower the frequency of clocks so that they take account of the respective dilation effects.

They have also placed Caesium clocks on tall buildings and flown them around the world to show extremely small variations that are predicted by the theory.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
66
Views
8K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
6K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
6K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
8K