If w is an even integer, then w^2 - 1 is not a prime number.

dgamma3
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
hello, I am trying to solve this problem:
If w is an even integer, then w^2 - 1 is not a prime number.

my current working.

prove by contradiction

If w is a even integer then w^2 -1 is a prime number.

if w = 2x
then w^{2} -1
= 4x^{2} -1

I am not sure where to go from here, maybe congruence relations:

n+1 = (4x^{2})y
(4x^{2})y | n+1 therefore this is a contradiction.

is this correct.
thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't do it by contradiction, but use:

w²-1=(w+1)(w-1)

also there is the exception of w=2 since then (w+1)(w-1)=3 \cdot 1=3 which is of course a prime. But by splitting it up this way we already see why. either side is the product of primes but this time one side is the empty product. But this is only true if w=2 since the integers as a ring have but one unit for multiplication.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top