student34
- 639
- 21
what can be said about 7? Is it like an infinitesimal? Is it smaller or bigger? What is it? Is it just [7,7]?
The discussion revolves around the implications of removing the number 7 from the real number line. Participants explore the nature of 7 in this context, questioning whether it can be likened to an infinitesimal or if it represents something else entirely. The conversation touches on set notation, the properties of points and intervals, and the relationship between numbers and their representations.
Participants express differing views on the nature of 7 and its relationship to infinitesimals, with no consensus reached on these points. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the properties of numbers and their set representations.
Participants highlight the importance of defining terms like "infinitesimal" and the need for clarity in mathematical notation. There are unresolved questions about the relationships between numbers and their representations in set theory.
If you remove 7 from the number line, then you get the real numbers with a point removed. A point has zero length.student34 said:what can be said about 7? Is it like an infinitesimal? Is it smaller or bigger? What is it? Is it just [7,7]?
mathman said:Your question is too vague. Explain what you really have in mind.
HallsofIvy said:Of the choices given, "[7, 7]", which is exactly the same as the set notation "{7}" is best. It is a single point. You would have to define exactly what you mean by "infinitesimal" in this context before anyone could answer your other questions.
student34 said:3/n→∞.
Office_Shredder said:What you've written doesn't make any sense. Did you mean something like
[tex]\lim_{n\to \infty} \frac{3}{n} = 0[/tex]?
It's not clear to me why you think this is related to the number 7. The length of the interval [7,7] is completely unrelated to the number 7 itself
student34 said:Doesn't [7,7] and 7 have similar properties?