I'm confused about this excited electron configuration

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on identifying excited electron configurations in chemistry, specifically between two configurations: a. 1s2 2s2 2px2 and b. 1s2 2s1 2px1 2py1 2pz1. It is established that configuration b is in an excited state because an electron from the 2s orbital is promoted to the 2pz orbital, while configuration a is improperly written and does not represent a valid excited state due to violations of Hund's rule. Both configurations violate Hund's rule, but only b represents a true excited state.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electron configurations
  • Knowledge of Hund's rule
  • Familiarity with the Aufbau principle
  • Basic concepts of quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Aufbau principle in detail
  • Learn about quantum numbers and their significance in electron configurations
  • Research examples of excited states in various elements
  • Explore the implications of electron configuration on chemical reactivity
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, educators, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of electron configurations and excited states in atomic theory.

veganscientist
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have already turned in my homework for chemistry however I'm still confused about this question:
Which electron configuration is in an excited state?
a.1s2 2s2 2px2
b.1s2 2s1 2px1 2py1 2pz1

My teacher told me that the only choice b was excited because choice a was in violation of Hund's rule. I am confused because I thought both of these choices were in violation of Hund's rule, and I'm not sure what the difference is. I know that choice a has an iccorect filling order because for 2px to have 2 electrons both 2py and 2pz would need 1 e-. Also I know that choice b has an incorrect filling order because the 2s needs to be filled before p can have any e-. So I thought both a and b would excited bacause they had electrons in the wrong places. Any and all help with this will be greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
I understand where you are coming from.

I think that , although both configurations are in violation of Hund's rule, only b represents a truly "excited" state because an electron from a 2s2 orbital was promoted to 2pz1.

Choice a, in contrast, is just written improperly. Whereas it should be 1s2 2s2 2px1 2py1, but an electron was demoted to the 2px2.

This is just my observation, but yes this is a tricky question. Maybe I overlooked something. If you ever find a definite answers, please message me. I'd like to know what it is.
 
You are perfectly right.
Clearly, a is an excited configuration, too.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
27K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K