Derivative of x^n: Using First Principles and Breaking it Down

  • Thread starter Thread starter JasonRox
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivative Stuck
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The derivative of x^(1/3) can be derived using first principles, specifically by applying the limit definition of a derivative. The established formula for the derivative, d/dx(x^n) = nx^(n-1), holds true even for non-integer values of n, such as n = 1/3. The discussion emphasizes the importance of manipulating the expression (x+h)^(1/3) and simplifying it to find the limit as h approaches 0. A key insight shared is the use of the identity a = (x+h)^(1/3) and b = x^(1/3) to facilitate the calculation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic calculus concepts, particularly derivatives.
  • Familiarity with the limit definition of a derivative.
  • Knowledge of exponent laws and simplification techniques.
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic expressions involving roots and powers.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the limit definition of a derivative in detail.
  • Practice deriving derivatives of polynomial functions using first principles.
  • Explore the implications of the power rule for non-integer exponents.
  • Learn advanced techniques for simplifying expressions involving roots and powers.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, mathematics educators, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of derivative concepts, particularly in the context of non-integer exponents.

JasonRox
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
2,381
Reaction score
4
x^(1/3)

The only way I have for this on this is to show that the derivative of x^n equals Nx^(n-1).

I can't think of a way to do it in first principles.

If I can just break up (x+h)^1/3, I'm good.

If you break that up, you get...

x^\frac{1}{3} + 1/3x^\frac{2}{9}h^\frac{1}{9} + 1/3x^\frac{1}{9}h^ \frac{2}{9}+ h^\frac{1}{3}

It's probably wrong, but that is all I can think of.

Any pointers would help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're just trying to get the derviative of x^{1/3}

You have the procedure written down correctly in the second line then you went way overboard after that.

\frac{d}{dx}x^n=nx^{n-1}
where n is a constant

Replace n with 1/3--that's all there is to it.

Is your question written correctly?
 
I don't think he's trying to calculate the derivative. He's trying to prove that the rule works even when n is not an integer (specifically when n=1/3).

Jason, are you allowed to use what you know about how to take the deriviate of exponentials, logarithms and composite functions? If you are, I suggest that you use

x^{\frac{1}{3}}=e^{\frac{1}{3}\ln x}
 
Last edited:
Actually know we can not do that.

This must be used doing first principles. I know how to find derivatives.

We must use h approaches 0 or x approaches a.

That is why I wrote (x+h)^1/3, which is from the h approaches 0 method.

Obviously we have (x+h)^1/3-x^1/3 for the numerator. That is why I broke it up in the first post, so I can get rid of the h in the numerator, but since I can't do that because (h^1/3)/h = 1/h^2/3, according to exponent laws. This is where I am stuck.

If I had an exam right now, I would have to do the x^n -> Nx^(n-1) method, but that is not practical nor what they are asking for.

Any tips are appreciated.

Note: We must assume we don't "know" the derivative of ln x in this case.
 
So I guess I'm not the only who is stuck.
 
I remember a thread here at PF recently:
Set:
a=(x+h)^{\frac{1}{3}},b=x^{\frac{1}{3}}
Then, for the derivative:
\frac{a-b}{h}=\frac{(a-b)(a^{2}+ab+b^{2})}{(a^{2}+ab+b^{2})h}=
\frac{a^{3}-b^{3}}{(a^{2}+ab+b^{2})h}=\frac{h}{(a^{2}+ab+b^{2})h}=
\frac{1}{(a^{2}+ab+b^{2})}\to\frac{1}{3x^{\frac{2}{3}}} (h\to{0})
 
You're my hero! :blushing:

Thanks!

Gave me a whole new perspective on how to do this.
 

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
34
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K