I'm thinking of entering the field of Theoretical Physics

AI Thread Summary
John, a 17-year-old interested in science and technology, seeks insights about the daily experiences of physicists and college students. A physics student shares that a typical day for a physicist can vary between computational and pure theoretical work. Computational physicists focus on numerical solutions and simulations, often using programming to solve problems without experimental data. Meanwhile, pure theoretical physicists engage in mathematical modeling to explain phenomena like dark matter, also requiring strong programming skills. For students, the initial years of college are relatively easy, but upper-level courses present significant challenges, demanding new ways of understanding complex concepts like abstract vectors and quantum mechanics. Adapting to these difficulties is essential for success in physics.
JohnApp
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
First off, I'd like to introduce myself as this is my first post. My name is John, I'm 17, unemployed and science/technology has kept me entertained and happy for most of my life.

With that said, I have a few questions.

The first one is for the physicists (w/ a job) on this forum. What's a typical day like for you at work? It is my understanding that physicists who do not enjoy their work are not cut out for it.

The second is for students. What's a typical day like at your college/university?

I'll think of some more later, but that's all for now.

Thanks ahead of time for your replies.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, I am a physics student doing research for a theoretical biophysics professor. For the first question of being a theoretical physicist ... you can go down two roads... computational physics or pure theoretical physics. Anything that you try to simulate using a computer or predict without an experimental apparatus is considered theoretical work. You should be extremely comfortable with programing and such, as when you get up into the higher physics everything is solved numerically (by computer) because none of the equations you need to model a system is solvable in closed form (or exactly). In other words you can only approximate a solution for a modeled system.

Usually these computational physicists are trying to solve problems or develop ideas for which there are no experimental results for. For instance there is a theoretical professor at my school who proposed a new mechanism to build more accurate atomic clocks and then he uses code to approximate what would happen with his proposed scheme.

As for the other kind of theoretical physicist, you are basically a pure mathematician trying to find new models that can account for stuff like dark matter and such that unifies. Those are standard model theorist, and they also do a lot of computational computing. If you go into theory, expect to become programmer.

As for the student end of college... I go to class, go home, and do my homework. The first two years are extremely easy, but then when you go into the upperdivision level courses, it becomes night and day ... things in physics aren't nearly as intuitive and you'll have to learn how to use tools without know how they function. You'll also need to develop new ways of understanding material such as abstract vectors and tensors ... so on and so forth. Once you get into physics such as quantum mechanics, you can no longer visualize what is happening and you need to find a new way to understand the material. This is what you have to look forward to.
 
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I'm going to make this one quick since I have little time. Background: Throughout my life I have always done good in Math. I almost always received 90%+, and received easily upwards of 95% when I took normal-level HS Math courses. When I took Grade 9 "De-Streamed" Math (All students must take "De-Streamed" in Canada), I initially had 98% until I got very sick and my mark had dropped to 95%. The Physics teachers and Math teachers talked about me as if I were some sort of genius. Then, an...
Back
Top