Image position and magnification for underwater spherical lens

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the image position and magnification for an underwater spherical lens. The derived image position is approximately -42.7 cm, indicating a virtual image located to the left of the vertex. The magnification is calculated to be about -0.757, suggesting the image is inverted and approximately 75.7% the height of the original object. Participants express confusion regarding the lens's behavior and the accuracy of the equations used, particularly in relation to the diagram provided. The conversation highlights the importance of verifying calculations and understanding the context of the lens's properties.
lorenz0
Messages
151
Reaction score
28
Homework Statement
A spherical glass lens of radius ##R=20cm## with refraction index ##n_2=1.5## is placed underwater. Find the position of the image placed at ##p=50cm## from the vertex ##V## and the magnification of the image.
Relevant Equations
##\frac{n_1}{p}+\frac{n_2}{1}=\frac{n_2-n_1}{R}##, ##M=\frac{n_1 q}{n_2 p}##
Using the data given and recalling that in this configuration ##R<0## I get: ##\frac{1.33}{0.5}+\frac{1.5}{q}=\frac{1.5-1.33}{-0.2}\Rightarrow q\approx -0.427 m=-42.7 cm## so the image is virtual and is ##42.7\ cm## to the left of vertex ##V##. The magnification is ##M=\frac{n_1 q}{n_2 p}=\frac{1.33\cdot (-0.427)}{1.5\cdot 0.5}\approx -0.757## so the image is shorter (##\approx 75.7\%##) than the original and is upside down.

Is this correct? Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • lens.png
    lens.png
    23.8 KB · Views: 118
Physics news on Phys.org
lorenz0 said:
Homework Statement:: A spherical glass lens of radius ##R=20cm## with refraction index ##n_2=1.5## is placed underwater. Find the position of the image placed at ##p=50cm## from the vertex ##V## and the magnification of the image.
Relevant Equations:: ##\frac{n_1}{p}+\frac{n_2}{1}=\frac{n_2-n_1}{R}##, ##M=\frac{n_1 q}{n_2 p}##

Using the data given and recalling that in this configuration ##R<0## I get: ##\frac{1.33}{0.5}+\frac{1.5}{q}=\frac{1.5-1.33}{-0.2}\Rightarrow q\approx -0.427 m=-42.7 cm## so the image is virtual and is ##42.7\ cm## to the left of vertex ##V##. The magnification is ##M=\frac{n_1 q}{n_2 p}=\frac{1.33\cdot (-0.427)}{1.5\cdot 0.5}\approx -0.757## so the image is shorter (##\approx 75.7\%##) than the original and is upside down.

Is this correct? Thanks.
It's always worth doing a sanity check with a sketch.
Draw a small vertical object standing at P and rays from its top.
Where would a ray to V be refracted to, nearer the axis or further away? The tip of the image must lie on that line, perhaps projected back. Does your answer match that?
 
  • Like
Likes lorenz0
haruspex said:
It's always worth doing a sanity check with a sketch.
Draw a small vertical object standing at P and rays from its top.
Where would a ray to V be refracted to, nearer the axis or further away? The tip of the image must lie on that line, perhaps projected back. Does your answer match that?
Yes, I think it does. The problem confuses me a bit because I don't know if I can assume that the glass lens will behave like a mirror or not. If it does, looking at a similar configuration here (https://opentextbc.ca/universityphysicsv3openstax/chapter/spherical-mirrors/) I would say yes.
 
Last edited:
lorenz0 said:
Yes, I think it does. .
I don‘t think so, but maybe I misunderstand the diagram. It appears to show a concave glass lens of arbitrary thickness. That is not what I would have expected from the text.
 
  • Like
Likes lorenz0
haruspex said:
I don‘t think so, but maybe I misunderstand the diagram. It appears to show a concave glass lens of arbitrary thickness. That is not what I would have expected from the text.
What is it that you think I should change in my solution?
I too was confused by the discrepancy between the diagram and the text (the glass is blue and the water is gray...) but in the end I decided to follow the diagram, hence my solution.
 
Last edited:
lorenz0 said:
What is it that you think I should change in my solution?
I too was confused by the discrepancy between the diagram and the text (the glass is blue and the water is gray...) but in the end I decided to follow the diagram, hence my solution.
I'm not familiar with the relevant equation you quote. (I assume the 1 should be a q.) Can you provide a link, or at least a clear statement of what all the variables mean and the context in which it applies?
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
lorenz0 said:
Ok, thanks. (That article is a bit confusing because it crosses over di and do in the diagram.)
But it does not give the formula for M that you quote. Since the image is to the left of V, my sketch implies it is upright. I wonder if for the M formula you should be using p=-0.5m.
 
Back
Top