Image position and magnification for underwater spherical lens

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the image position and magnification for a spherical glass lens with a radius of 20 cm and a refractive index of 1.5, placed underwater. The derived image position is approximately -42.7 cm, indicating a virtual image located to the left of the vertex V. The magnification calculated is approximately -0.757, suggesting the image is 75.7% shorter than the original and is inverted. Participants emphasize the importance of visualizing the problem through sketches to confirm calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of geometric optics principles
  • Familiarity with the lens maker's equation
  • Knowledge of magnification formulas in optics
  • Basic skills in sketching ray diagrams for optical systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the lens maker's equation for spherical lenses
  • Learn about ray diagrams for concave and convex lenses
  • Explore the concept of virtual images in optical systems
  • Investigate the effects of different refractive indices on image formation
USEFUL FOR

Students studying optics, physics educators, and anyone interested in understanding image formation through lenses, particularly in underwater environments.

lorenz0
Messages
151
Reaction score
28
Homework Statement
A spherical glass lens of radius ##R=20cm## with refraction index ##n_2=1.5## is placed underwater. Find the position of the image placed at ##p=50cm## from the vertex ##V## and the magnification of the image.
Relevant Equations
##\frac{n_1}{p}+\frac{n_2}{1}=\frac{n_2-n_1}{R}##, ##M=\frac{n_1 q}{n_2 p}##
Using the data given and recalling that in this configuration ##R<0## I get: ##\frac{1.33}{0.5}+\frac{1.5}{q}=\frac{1.5-1.33}{-0.2}\Rightarrow q\approx -0.427 m=-42.7 cm## so the image is virtual and is ##42.7\ cm## to the left of vertex ##V##. The magnification is ##M=\frac{n_1 q}{n_2 p}=\frac{1.33\cdot (-0.427)}{1.5\cdot 0.5}\approx -0.757## so the image is shorter (##\approx 75.7\%##) than the original and is upside down.

Is this correct? Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • lens.png
    lens.png
    23.8 KB · Views: 130
Physics news on Phys.org
lorenz0 said:
Homework Statement:: A spherical glass lens of radius ##R=20cm## with refraction index ##n_2=1.5## is placed underwater. Find the position of the image placed at ##p=50cm## from the vertex ##V## and the magnification of the image.
Relevant Equations:: ##\frac{n_1}{p}+\frac{n_2}{1}=\frac{n_2-n_1}{R}##, ##M=\frac{n_1 q}{n_2 p}##

Using the data given and recalling that in this configuration ##R<0## I get: ##\frac{1.33}{0.5}+\frac{1.5}{q}=\frac{1.5-1.33}{-0.2}\Rightarrow q\approx -0.427 m=-42.7 cm## so the image is virtual and is ##42.7\ cm## to the left of vertex ##V##. The magnification is ##M=\frac{n_1 q}{n_2 p}=\frac{1.33\cdot (-0.427)}{1.5\cdot 0.5}\approx -0.757## so the image is shorter (##\approx 75.7\%##) than the original and is upside down.

Is this correct? Thanks.
It's always worth doing a sanity check with a sketch.
Draw a small vertical object standing at P and rays from its top.
Where would a ray to V be refracted to, nearer the axis or further away? The tip of the image must lie on that line, perhaps projected back. Does your answer match that?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: lorenz0
haruspex said:
It's always worth doing a sanity check with a sketch.
Draw a small vertical object standing at P and rays from its top.
Where would a ray to V be refracted to, nearer the axis or further away? The tip of the image must lie on that line, perhaps projected back. Does your answer match that?
Yes, I think it does. The problem confuses me a bit because I don't know if I can assume that the glass lens will behave like a mirror or not. If it does, looking at a similar configuration here (https://opentextbc.ca/universityphysicsv3openstax/chapter/spherical-mirrors/) I would say yes.
 
Last edited:
lorenz0 said:
Yes, I think it does. .
I don‘t think so, but maybe I misunderstand the diagram. It appears to show a concave glass lens of arbitrary thickness. That is not what I would have expected from the text.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: lorenz0
haruspex said:
I don‘t think so, but maybe I misunderstand the diagram. It appears to show a concave glass lens of arbitrary thickness. That is not what I would have expected from the text.
What is it that you think I should change in my solution?
I too was confused by the discrepancy between the diagram and the text (the glass is blue and the water is gray...) but in the end I decided to follow the diagram, hence my solution.
 
Last edited:
lorenz0 said:
What is it that you think I should change in my solution?
I too was confused by the discrepancy between the diagram and the text (the glass is blue and the water is gray...) but in the end I decided to follow the diagram, hence my solution.
I'm not familiar with the relevant equation you quote. (I assume the 1 should be a q.) Can you provide a link, or at least a clear statement of what all the variables mean and the context in which it applies?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
lorenz0 said:
Ok, thanks. (That article is a bit confusing because it crosses over di and do in the diagram.)
But it does not give the formula for M that you quote. Since the image is to the left of V, my sketch implies it is upright. I wonder if for the M formula you should be using p=-0.5m.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K