Imaginary numbers outside of math

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the application of imaginary numbers outside of mathematics, particularly in fields such as electrical engineering, signal processing, and control systems. Participants share various contexts in which imaginary numbers are utilized, including their roles in analyzing sinusoidal signals and solving differential equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that imaginary numbers are frequently used in electrical engineering, signal processing, and control systems analysis.
  • One participant mentions using imaginary numbers for magnetic resonance imaging and quadrature detection, highlighting their role in Fourier transforms.
  • Another participant explains that DeMoivre's Theorem allows for representing sinusoidal signals as complex quantities, simplifying the manipulation of these signals.
  • It is suggested that complex exponentials are preferred in engineering due to their neatness in solving linear differential equations and their relation to eigenvalue problems.
  • Participants discuss the use of 'j' instead of 'i' in electrical engineering to avoid confusion with current, which is represented by 'i'.
  • Complex numbers are described as effective for representing impedance in AC signals, which includes both real and imaginary components related to frequency.
  • Phasors, impedance, and complex power are mentioned as additional concepts that utilize imaginary numbers.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the utility of imaginary numbers in various engineering applications, but there are nuances in how they are applied and understood, indicating that multiple perspectives and methods exist.

Contextual Notes

The discussion reflects a range of applications and interpretations of imaginary numbers, with some participants emphasizing their mathematical basis while others focus on practical engineering uses. There is mention of alternative methods for analysis that do not involve complex numbers, suggesting a variety of approaches within the field.

ffleming7
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
In Algebra we are learning and using imaginary numbers. Someone asked if imaginary numbers are ever used outside of math, and our teacher said he talked to an electrical engineer who used imaginary numbers all the time. Our teacher didn't know how or why they were used in electrical engineering, just that they were. I was wondering how the imaginary numbers are used in electrical engineering and/or anywhere else other than math.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Imaginary numbers come up in electrical engineering, signal processing, and control systems analysis all the time. I primarily use them for magnetic resonance imaging in for quadrature detection and the Fourier transform. Basically a signal that is a cosine is real and a signal that is a sine is imaginary.
 
I suppose you've been taught DeMoivre's Theorem/Formula?
ie.
e^{ix} = cos(x)+isin(x)
In engineering we deal A LOT with sinusoidal signals with phases. Since 'i' is just a phase shift of pi/2, we can represent phases as a "complex quantity". This allows us to convert all types of sinusoidal signals into exponentials rather than trig, where you need big trig identities to simplify or manipulate.

In physics and engineering, a lot of processes and theories deal with differential equations. There solutions are in the form of (real) trig equations ie. asin(x) + bcos(x). But again, these are too long and tedious to deal with so we put it complex exponential form and 'remember' that the solution is always the real part of exp(ix).

That is the very very basics of it, it off course is much more complicated and hopefully I havn't miss-explained parts of it. Someone will correct me though :)
 
Use it all the time... it's no joke. Seriously.
 
in control systems you are always working with 'i'.
wherever we have to deal with frequency, 'i' comes into picture.

also for your information, in electrical engineering most of the time, we write 'j' instead of 'i'. (i thought this would add to your curiousity) I don't know the exact reason, but may be because we use 'i' for representing current, that's why.
 
Well, to be precise its for the mathematical analysis that you use complex numbers. There are obviously ways to analyze without using complex numbers, but they're tedious. As n0_3sc has pointed out, Euler's Theorem expresses a direct mapping between complex exponentials and sinusoids. From that property follow some other properties of complex exponentials which form the basis for phasor analysis, frequency domain computation and (therefore) the mathematics of control system analysis. Fundamentally, Euler's Theorem is an important connection between one of the most important pair of signals in electrical engineering and complex numbers.

Another reason you will like to use the complex exponential in expressing solutions to linear differential equations is its relation to eigenvalue problems. Specifically,

D_{x}(e^{j\omega x}) = je^{jx}
D_{x}^{2}(e^{j\omega x}) = -\omega^{2}e^{jx}

Sure enough you could do this with sinusoids too (in fact that's what you're doing right now), but doing it with complex exponentials is a whole lot neater. Quite a few problems of interest in the time domain involve the solution of eigenvalue equations, where these properties are often used.

Finally, even though all this is sufficient reason to use complex exponentials and more generally complex numbers, both the Laplace and Fourier Transforms have kernels that are complex exponentials and are members of a more general class of transforms whose variants are heavily used in signal processing, control systems and lot of other allied areas of electrical engineering and mathematics.

And yes, you encounter j in EE rather than i, because historically i(t) has been used to denote "instantaneous" current, as Varun points out. (http://www.perl.com/doc/manual/html/lib/Math/Complex.html differs...apparently, i has also been used to denote intensity :-p)
 
varunag said:
in control systems you are always working with 'i'.
wherever we have to deal with frequency, 'i' comes into picture.

also for your information, in electrical engineering most of the time, we write 'j' instead of 'i'. (i thought this would add to your curiousity) I don't know the exact reason, but may be because we use 'i' for representing current, that's why.

That's correct. A lower case "i" is reserved for current in EE.

CS
 
Lets not forget that complex numbers are just about the best way to represent resistance in AC signals. We call it impedance...where the system has both a real and imaginary resistance to a given frequency...as pointed out, its particular to the phase info and is important when looking to match up several modules for proper power matching...
 
Phasors, Impedance, Complex Power... list goes on.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
7K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
12K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K