How Can You Calculate the Impact Force of a Free-Falling Object?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the impact force of a free-falling object, knowing the dwell time of contact between the object and the surface is essential, as it is required for the formula F = δp * δt. Without this dwell time, only the impulse (δp) can be determined, not the average force. In cases where a stone impacts a perfectly hard floor, the contact time is nearly zero, leading to an effectively infinite average force. Additionally, the distinction between elastic and inelastic collisions is crucial; elastic collisions conserve kinetic energy while inelastic collisions do not. Therefore, for rigid objects, discussing impact force is less meaningful than focusing on momentum and energy transfer.
leden
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I wonder how could I calculate impact force of an object (eg. a stone) in a free fall impacting on the perfectly inelastic (perfectly hard) floor.
I know:
- m -mass of the falling object
- h -height of the fall
- v -speed at the time of impact
- t -time it takes from highest point to the lowest
- I can also calculate kinetic energy of an object at the impact point
I DO NOT know dwell time (how long the object and the floor are in contact).
So I cannot calculate the impact force with F = \delta p * \delta t.

How can I calculate the impact force?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
leden said:
I DO NOT know dwell time (how long the object and the floor are in contact). So I cannot calculate the impact force with F = \delta p * \delta t.
You have answered your own question with this statement. You cannot determine the force, or even the average force, of the impact without knowing how long they are in contact. All you can figure out is the impulse delta p. In your example of a stone falling on a perfectly hard (rigid) floor, the stone isn't going to deform elastically, so it must bounce or shatter. In this case, the time spent in contact is nearly zero. Since the impulse is certainly not zero, the average force is practically infinite. So for elastic "billiard ball" type collisions, it is not meaningful to talk about force of impact--momentum/energy transfer is the best you can do.

edit: I should clear up a likely source of confusion. Even though one normally thinks of "elastic" as being stretchy or rubbery, that is not what it means in physics jargon. An elastic collision means that there as just as much kinetic energy after the collision as there was before. This can (and often does) apply to objects that are perfectly hard. An example of an inelastic collision is a lump of clay smashing into another lump of clay and sticking to it. Momentum is conserved, but kinetic energy is not. Some of it was used up in changing the shape of the lumps.
 
Last edited:
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top