Impedance Matching: The mathematical Conditions for Matching Network

AI Thread Summary
Impedance matching is essential for maximizing power transfer between a source with impedance Z_S and a load with impedance Z_L. The discussion focuses on the mathematical conditions required for effective impedance matching, specifically whether both Z^*_s = Z_in and Z_out = Z^*_L need to be satisfied simultaneously or if satisfying one condition is sufficient. It raises the question of whether achieving Z^*_s = Z_in automatically ensures Z_out = Z^*_L. The conversation emphasizes the conceptual nature of impedance matching rather than practical applications. Ultimately, the thread seeks clarity on the necessity of adjusting matching network components to meet both conditions.
The Tortoise-Man
Messages
95
Reaction score
5
Assume we have a network consisting of a source with impedance ##Z_S## and load with impedance ##Z_L## and
we want to perform impedance matching on them in order to obtain the maximum power transfer:

Zs Zl MATCH.png


Note that in practice there may occur sitations where causes more harm than profit (see eg Baluncore's example here: https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...g-when-the-transmitter-line-and-load.1009889/ ; see post #2)But the motivation of this question has pure conceptional nature; ie I'm not asking here IF it should be done but HOW it should be correctly done, if one has to do it.

In general, ##Z_S \neq Z_L^*##. So principally, what one do in order to match impedances, one places a matching network between source and load (the components which the matching network contains depend on concrete problem):

Zs Zl Matching Network.png


Indeed, the matching network can consist of resistive components, it might be a L- or T-network and and and... ) and one tries to adjust the parameters of the components of the matching network to satisfy certain matching conditions; see below.

Now having implemented the matching network in our circuit in order to impose the right mathematical conditions we introduce following two auxilary impedances: the input impedance ##Z_{in}## and output impedance ##Z_{out}## defined as follows:
Zs Zl Matching ZIN.png


Zs Zl Matching ZOUT.png
My question is: In order to obtain the impedance matching
for maximal power transfer which conditions should be satisfied?

##Z^*_s= Z_{in}##, ##Z_{out}= Z^*_L## or both simultaneously?

Or even more interesting question is: Assume we succeed in adaping the components within the matching network such that ##Z^*_s= Z_{in}## holds. Is then ##Z_{out}= Z^*_L##
automatically satisfied?

So the question is basically about if it really neccassary to adapt the components within the matching network such that they should satisfy both conditions ##Z^*_s= Z_{in}## AND ##Z_{out}= Z^*_L##, or is one of these conditions really redundant in the sense that it suffice to adjust the matching box only to satisfy ONE of them and the second is the satisfied automatically?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Thread closed temporarily as a potential repost of previous threads. Hopefully I can deal with this before the weekend.

The Tortoise-Man said:
Sorry, you are right, presumably sending a PM to you about how to continue the discussion there would have been a better option. I will keep that in mind.
 
Hey guys. I have a question related to electricity and alternating current. Say an alien fictional society developed electricity, and settled on a standard like 73V AC current at 46 Hz. How would appliances be designed, and what impact would the lower frequency and voltage have on transformers, wiring, TVs, computers, LEDs, motors, and heating, assuming the laws of physics and technology are the same as on Earth?
While I was rolling out a shielded cable, a though came to my mind - what happens to the current flow in the cable if there came a short between the wire and the shield in both ends of the cable? For simplicity, lets assume a 1-wire copper wire wrapped in an aluminum shield. The wire and the shield has the same cross section area. There are insulating material between them, and in both ends there is a short between them. My first thought, the total resistance of the cable would be reduced...
I used to be an HVAC technician. One time I had a service call in which there was no power to the thermostat. The thermostat did not have power because the fuse in the air handler was blown. The fuse in the air handler was blown because there was a low voltage short. The rubber coating on one of the thermostat wires was chewed off by a rodent. The exposed metal in the thermostat wire was touching the metal cabinet of the air handler. This was a low voltage short. This low voltage...
Back
Top