Implicit Differentiation (for a normal derivative) with Multivariable Functions

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around using implicit differentiation to find the derivative z' for the given multivariable equations. The user initially differentiates both equations but encounters confusion regarding the necessity of both equations to solve for z'. It is clarified that y is a function of both x and z, and that eliminating y can simplify the process. The importance of applying proper derivative rules is emphasized, as it can lead to cancellation of variables. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the need for careful differentiation and variable management in multivariable calculus.
paul2211
Messages
36
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



z^{3}x+z-2y-1=0
xz+y-x^{2}+5=0

Define z as a function of x, find z'.

Homework Equations



I guess the two equations above...

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, I just differentiated the first one with respect to x and got:

3z^{2}xz'+z^{3}3+1=0
z' = \frac{-1-z^{3}{3z^{2}x}

If I differentiate the second equation, I get something completely different...

z+xz'-2x=0
z' = \frac{2x-z}{x}

I'm sorry if I typed some of my work above wrong, but the main reason I'm stuck on this question is: I don't even see why I need the two equations to solve this problem

Thanks in advance to you guys.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF, paul2211! :smile:

Your variable y is a function of x and z.
As such you need to consider it as well when differentiating.

Note that in this case you can use your second equation to eliminate y altogether.

Btw, you appear to have made at least one type when differentiating the first equation.
 
Thank you for your quick reply Serena.

So does this mean y = y(x, z(x))?

If so, and I somehow couldn't cancel the y between the two equations, wouldn't I have \frac{\partial y}{\partial x}, \frac{\partial y}{\partial z} and \frac{dz}{dx} to solve for?

Since I would only have two equations, does this mean I can't solve for \frac{dz}{dx} if I didn't have the insight to cancel out the other variable? (y in this case).
 
Yes and yes.

If you didn't cancel y beforehand, y will probably cancel itself as long as you apply the proper derivative rules.
It's just less work to cancel y beforehand.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K