Implicit Differentiation (for a normal derivative) with Multivariable Functions

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves implicit differentiation of two equations with respect to the variable x, where z is defined as a function of x. The equations are z^{3}x + z - 2y - 1 = 0 and xz + y - x^{2} + 5 = 0.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to differentiate both equations but encounters discrepancies in their results. They express confusion about the necessity of both equations for finding z'. Some participants clarify the relationship between y, x, and z, suggesting that y should be treated as a function of x and z.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring the implications of treating y as a function of x and z. Guidance has been offered regarding the differentiation process and the potential to eliminate y from the equations, though no consensus has been reached on the best approach.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of potential typographical errors in the original poster's differentiation work, and the implications of having fewer equations than unknowns are being considered.

paul2211
Messages
36
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



z[itex]^{3}[/itex]x+z-2y-1=0
xz+y-x[itex]^{2}[/itex]+5=0

Define z as a function of x, find z'.

Homework Equations



I guess the two equations above...

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, I just differentiated the first one with respect to x and got:

3z[itex]^{2}[/itex]xz'+z[itex]^{3}[/itex]3+1=0
z' = [itex]\frac{-1-z^{3}{3z[itex]^{2}[/itex]x}[/itex]

If I differentiate the second equation, I get something completely different...

z+xz'-2x=0
z' = [itex]\frac{2x-z}{x}[/itex]

I'm sorry if I typed some of my work above wrong, but the main reason I'm stuck on this question is: I don't even see why I need the two equations to solve this problem

Thanks in advance to you guys.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF, paul2211! :smile:

Your variable y is a function of x and z.
As such you need to consider it as well when differentiating.

Note that in this case you can use your second equation to eliminate y altogether.

Btw, you appear to have made at least one type when differentiating the first equation.
 
Thank you for your quick reply Serena.

So does this mean y = y(x, z(x))?

If so, and I somehow couldn't cancel the y between the two equations, wouldn't I have [itex]\frac{\partial y}{\partial x}[/itex], [itex]\frac{\partial y}{\partial z}[/itex] and [itex]\frac{dz}{dx}[/itex] to solve for?

Since I would only have two equations, does this mean I can't solve for [itex]\frac{dz}{dx}[/itex] if I didn't have the insight to cancel out the other variable? (y in this case).
 
Yes and yes.

If you didn't cancel y beforehand, y will probably cancel itself as long as you apply the proper derivative rules.
It's just less work to cancel y beforehand.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K