Implicit Differentiation w/ Composite Function

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the application of implicit differentiation in the context of composite functions. The equation y = f(x) is analyzed, where the slope of the curve is given as 1/2 and the x-coordinate decreases at a rate of 3 units/s. The correct approach involves using the chain rule to express dy/dt as f'(x(t)) * dx/dt, confirming that dy/dt is dependent on both the derivative of the function and the rate of change of x. The initial attempt to substitute values directly into the derivative formula was clarified and corrected.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of implicit differentiation
  • Knowledge of composite functions
  • Familiarity with the chain rule in calculus
  • Basic proficiency in derivatives and rates of change
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the chain rule in different contexts
  • Explore examples of implicit differentiation with various functions
  • Learn about the relationship between derivatives and rates of change
  • Practice problems involving composite functions and their derivatives
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those focusing on implicit differentiation and composite functions, as well as educators seeking to clarify these concepts in a teaching environment.

Loppyfoot
Messages
192
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given the equation y= f(x) , at a certain point the slope of the curve is 1/2 and the x-coordinate decreases at 3 units/s. At that point, how fast is the y-coordinate of the object changing?





The Attempt at a Solution



Dy/dx = f ' (x) dx/dt

Would that be the correct way to begin this problem? Then plug in 3 for dx/dt and 1/2 for f'(x)?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Loppyfoot said:

Homework Statement


Given the equation y= f(x) , at a certain point the slope of the curve is 1/2 and the x-coordinate decreases at 3 units/s. At that point, how fast is the y-coordinate of the object changing?

The Attempt at a Solution



Dy/dx = f ' (x) dx/dt

Would that be the correct way to begin this problem? Then plug in 3 for dx/dt and 1/2 for f'(x)?

Thanks
Not quite.
You have
y = f(x), where both y and x are assumed (implicitly) to be functions of t. I could write this as y(t) = f(x(t)), which would make the dependence of y and x on t explicit

dy/dt = d/dt(f(x(t)) = f'(x(t)) dx/dt
Here I have used the chain rule.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K