Importance of CAMPEP Accreditation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shooter2
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
CAMPEP accreditation is crucial for undergraduate students considering graduate school in medical physics. Accredited programs ensure that students receive the necessary coursework and lab experience required for entry-level positions in the field. Employers often prefer graduates from accredited programs, as it provides immediate assurance of the candidate's qualifications. Additionally, upcoming changes in board certification requirements in the U.S. will likely mandate that applicants come from accredited residencies and graduate programs. While some non-accredited programs may still offer adequate training, they require extra effort to communicate their qualifications to potential employers. It's also worth noting that non-accredited programs may seek accreditation in the future, making it important for prospective students to inquire about such plans during the application process.
Shooter2
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I am an undergraduate student majoring in Physics, considering the possibility of applying to graduate school for medical physics when I graduate. My question for you is, how important is CAMPEP (Commision on Accreditation of Medical Physics Education Programs) accreditation for residencies/entry level jobs?

Thanks for your responses.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's important enough that if I were an undergrad contemplating a career in medical physics, that graduate schools with CAMPEP accreditation would be my first choices.

The reasons for this:
(1) CAPMPEP certifies that the program covers the basic course and lab requirements necessary for one to begin work as a medical physics resident or junior physicist. Hence, someone starting out in the field, you know that your education will include the necessary tools you need for the work in your career.

This is as opposed to some programs that may claim 'medical physics' specialization in that your graduate project involves something related to medicine, but that don't provide you with an appropriate clinical background for the profession.

(2) A potential employer can look at your CV and immediately know that your background knowledge is sufficient for an entry-level position. It is important to point out that there are many non-accredited programs out there that also give you a sufficient background, but you have the extra hurdle of communicating that to the employer. It has been my experience, that all-else being equal, graduates from accredited programs are given preference over those from non-accredited programs.

(3) Shortly (ie. will likely apply to those students starting graduate studies now), requirements for board certification in the US will require that applicants come from accredited residencies and later graduate programs. Personally, I'm not sure exactly how this is going to work, as I don't think there are enough accredited programs to fill the need, but this is the direction of things.


I might also add that just because a program isn't currently accedited, it doesn't mean they won't be by the time your graduate. During the application process, one question that would be important to ask is whether or not there are any plans to seek accreditation.
 
Excellent, thank you for the helpful reply Choppy. That really clears up my question.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top