Improving Efficiency in MCNP Neutron Simulations: Tips and Tricks for Beginners

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on achieving higher efficiency in MCNP neutron simulations, specifically with a model using 16 He3 detectors. The user reports only achieving 6-7% efficiency, which is significantly lower than the 11% efficiency noted in other technical notes for a similar setup with fewer detectors. Concerns are raised about the positioning of the detectors and the materials used in the simulation, particularly the matrix composed of Pu240. Participants suggest reviewing the physical parameters and the configuration of the detector setup to identify potential issues affecting efficiency. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the simulation parameters and materials to improve results.
Estelassar
Messages
2
Reaction score
2
Hi, i am looking for some help on MCNP, more precisely mcnpx 2.7 for neutron simulation.

I created a model of semi opened detector with a various number of 1 inch He3 (here 16)
and i only obtain 6-7% efficiency.
the fact is, I've others technicals notes about same "types" of detector, for example 12 He3 1" disposed in square (wich is not the best positionning) where it's mentionned 11% of efficiency for approximatively the same sort of matrix.

In my case the matrix is composed of Pu240, below you will find my physicals parameters for the simulation.

Do you have some feedback about that ? can someone tell me if i am wrong somewhere to obtain an so low efficiency ?

I am in the blur...
Thx by advance
Qgd3Tsp.png


Code:
mode n
c
Sdef cel=d1 X=d2 Y=d3 z=d4 erg=d5   
SI1 L 11
SP1 D  1
c
Si2 -14 14
SP2   0  1
c
SI3 -14 14
SP3   0  1
c
SI4   0  34.2
SP4   0   1
c
SP5 -3   0.79493   4.68927       $ 240Pu spectre de watt
c
c ----------------- Materiaux ----------------
c ACIER INOX
C --> Acier inoxydable 18-10 *************************************************
M1      6000.70c -0.001200  24050.70c -0.007513  24052.70c -0.150659
        24053.70c -0.017412  24054.70c -0.004416  26054.70c -0.040580
        26056.70c -0.660588  26057.70c -0.015529  26058.70c -0.002103
        28058.70c -0.067198  28060.70c -0.026776  28061.70c -0.001183
        28062.70c -0.003835  28064.70c -0.001008
c
c AIR ************************************************************************
M3   007014.70c   -0.80
     008016.70c   -0.20
c Helium 3 ****************************************************
M4   002003.70c   -1.0
c
M10   032073.70c -1.
c
c
C ------------------------------- polyethylene  high density (-0.95) -------------------------------
M25       1001.70c -0.143685   1002.70c -0.000033   6000.70c -0.856282
MT25      poly.01t  $ poly.70t
c
c ************************** Cadmium ******************************************
M27   48112.70c  -1.0
c
c --- Matrice source ---
c
c --- Hydrogénée 100% vinyle (densite = 0.4) ---
m50 &
   01001.70c 0.5 & $ H-Hydrogene
    06000.70c 0.33 & $ C-Carbone
    17035.70c 0.17  $ Cl-Chlore
c
c --- Mixte(densite = 0.8) ---
c m50 &
c 1001.70c -0.516    & $ H-Hydrogene
c   8016.70c -0.0645   & $ O-Oxygene
c   17035.70c -0.3655  & $ Cl-Chlore
c   25055.70c -0.00076 & $ Mn-Manganese
c   26056.70c -0.053   & $ Fe-Fer
c   29063.70c -0.0003    $ Cu-Cuivre
c --- Métallique (densite = 0.8 - 7.8) ---
c m50 &
c 06000.70c -0.00170 & $ C-Carbone
c 07014.70c -0.00012 & $ N-Azote
c 15031.70c -0.00035 & $ P-Phosphore
c 16032.70c -0.00035 & $ S-Soufre
c 25055.70c -0.01399 & $ Mn-Manganese
c 26056.70c -0.97801 & $ Fe-Fer
c 29063.70c -0.00548   $ Cu-Cuivre
c
c ******** TALLY neutron  ******
F4:N (340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355)
c
FM4   -1 4 103          $   -1 X 103  /// x= numéro mat hélium
SD4 1                   $ calcul volume tubes
c
ctme 5              $ TALLY Neutron
PRINT
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Sorry i can't help you but I am a student in nuclear engineering. I want to use this program. I must learn about C or C++ or Mathlap? Thanks
 
To use this program it's not necessary to know an programing language, it can help for sure (to automatize some tasks or grab data from the result files) but you can easily manipulate input and output files with some Excel.

If you begin, i recommend you this pdf http://www.nucleonica.net/wiki/images/6/6b/MCNPprimer.pdf
Good luck !
 
  • Like
Likes zhj2024 and Hamal_Arietis
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...

Similar threads

Back
Top