Improving Electrical Supply System for Lower Fault MVA: Analysis and Solutions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating fault MVA levels in an electrical supply system and exploring methods to limit fault MVA through transformer T1 to approximately five times the full load (FL) current. Participants confirm their calculations for fault MVA and pu impedances, with results indicating a fault MVA of 102.4 MVA through T1. Suggestions for improving the system include modifying the voltage impedance of T1 and using a reactor to reduce fault current. The importance of maintaining transformer impedance while implementing these changes is emphasized to effectively manage fault levels.
topcat123
Messages
77
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


FIGURE 3 shows part of an electrical supply system.

Draw the impedance diagrams reducing to a single impedance.

Calculate the fault MVA levels in each unit for a fault on the left 3.3 kV bus with the bus section
switch B open and A closed. Use a base MVA of 10 and show
the fault MVA levels on a diagram.

Comment on the result and suggest a method of improving the system to limit the fault MVA through T1 to approximately 5 × FL current. (It is not necessary to recalculate.)

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


The fault MVA and pu impedances
G_1 and G_2\text{fault MVA} = \frac{16}{0.8}=20MVA
G_1 and G_2\text{ pu impedance} = \frac{10}{20}\frac{20}{100}=0.1pu
G_3\text{fault MVA} = \frac{1.6}{0.8}=2MVA
G_3\text{ pu impedance} = \frac{10}{2}\frac{20}{100}=1pu
T_1,T_2and T_3\text{ pu impedance} = \frac{10}{10}\frac{5}{100}=0.05pu
So we need to work out the total impedance and fault current.
T_2||T_3=0.025pu
G_3+T_2||T_3=1.025pu
(G_3+T_2||T_3)||G_1||G_2=0.0477pu
[(G_3+T_2||T_3)||G_1||G_2]+T_1=0.0977pu
So the fault MVA
\frac{10}{0.0977}=102.4MVA
So the fault MVA through T1 is 102.4
and through the rest
\text{voltage MVA}(G_3+T_2||T_3)||G_1||G_2=102.4*0.0477=4.88MVA
Fault through G1 and G2
\frac{4.88}{0.1}=48.88MVA
Fault through G3+T2||T3
\frac{4.88}{1.025}=4.76
\text{voltage MVA G<sub>3</sub>}=4.76*1=4.76MVA
voltage MVA over T2||T3
=0.025*4.76=0.119MVA
Fault through T2 and T3
\frac{0.110}{0.05}=2.38MVA

I think this is correct.
The part I am struggling with is
"Comment on the result and suggest a method of improving the system to limit the fault MVA through T1 to approximately 5 × FL current. (It is not necessary to recalculate.)"

Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks
 

Attachments

  • Fig 3.png
    Fig 3.png
    3.9 KB · Views: 825
  • imp.png
    imp.png
    3.3 KB · Views: 514
Hi,
I have attempted the above question (before looking for help on here) and have the same answer as topcat123 for the first part, so assume I have calculated correctly.
I am to struggling on the second part of limiting the fault current through T1 to 5 x FL current.
I think I have found a way of doing this but this would be by changing the Voltage Impedance of T1 and also making use of a Reactor.
I am unsure if this is correct as changing the Voltage Impedance of T1 would effectively be changing the Transformer??
Any help would be appreciated.
Matt
 
The calculation, it seems to me to be correct. However I did the calculation according to IEC 60909 also-using only reactances- and the difference is 2.5% less.
Since the system is isolated-that means no connection with the outside system ,even the generator voltages will be 11[3.3] kV the voltage on 11 kV bus decrease up to 5.365 kV[1.61 kV on 3.3 system] in the case of short-circuit when the short-circuit current will be Isc=102.4/sqrt(3)/3.3 =17.92 kA. and then the MVA on T1 will be sqrt(3)*17.92*1.69=52.424 MVA only.
So now the T1 load is 5.24 times the rated-at 17.92 kA.
If the transformer T1 impedance stays unchanged you have to reduce the current flowing through by 5/5.24[17.50 kA] by inserting a reactor in the T1 circuit [my opinion a series reactor of 0.00252 ohm/17.5 kA/3.3 kV ]
 

Similar threads

Back
Top