Impurities effects in Type II SCs

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the effects of non-magnetic impurities on the transition temperature (Tc) in type II superconductors. It highlights that impurities introduce additional scattering, which reduces Tc, and emphasizes the need for a theoretical formula to estimate this reduction based on impurity properties such as size and shape. The conversation references the Abrikosov-Gorkov theory for magnetic impurities and seeks a similar approach for non-magnetic impurities. A key resource identified is the paper by Markowitz and Kadanoff (1963), which provides a formulation for estimating the change in Tc based on scattering cross-section and anisotropy interaction.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of type II superconductors and their properties
  • Familiarity with the concepts of transition temperature (Tc) and Cooper pairs
  • Knowledge of scattering theory and its implications in superconductivity
  • Basic grasp of the Abrikosov-Gorkov theory for magnetic impurities
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the formulation for dTc in the context of non-magnetic impurities as discussed in Markowitz and Kadanoff (1963)
  • Explore the impact of impurity size and shape on scattering in superconductors
  • Investigate the role of vortex dynamics in type II superconductors with impurities
  • Study the effects of different types of impurities on the phonon spectrum in superconductors
USEFUL FOR

Researchers and practitioners in superconductivity, materials scientists, and physicists interested in the effects of impurities on superconducting materials, particularly those working with type II superconductors and their applications in bulk samples.

Shiricon
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I have a question about how non-magnetic impurities affect the transition temperature in type II superconductors.

I know that the impurities introduce additional scattering and therefore act to reduce Tc, but is there a simple formula that would relate the effect on Tc due to particles of a particular size in relation to xi or lambda? Also, what about particle shape, as a sphere would cause scattering different from that of a long needle-like impurity?

Most of the papers I have found present experimental results showing the decrease of Tc, but I haven't found any that cite where I could find a theoretical estimation for the reduction of Tc with a specific impurity. I have found some very lengthy and complex formulas in a few papers, but it was not clear to me how the size or shape would factor into these formulas.

If you know a source or if you can guide me in the right direction, that would be helpful. Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"Particles of a particular size" doesn't really make much sense in this context, when we talk about impurities in SC we generally refer to atoms (well, ions); not particles. It is a microscopic effect. Also, "geometric size" is usually not very important, what matters is how well an impurities scatters electrons/pairs which in turn depends on its moment.

Particles will of course act affect vortex dynamics etc, but that won't affect Tc directly.
If you have a large number of particles dispersed in the solid one could of course imagine that this affects the phonon spectrum etc which might affect Tc somewhat; but that effect would presumably be very small.
 
Thank you for your input. I am trying to get the sense for this...

In a type II superconductor in the vortex state, impurities can act as pinning centers. However, with the addition of impurities/defects you reduce the mean free path by introducing additional scattering. As the Cooper pair is of the order of xi, I would naively think that a particle below the order of xi would have much less effect on scattering than a particle >xi. By particle I could mean ion; I am using the term generically to mean "something" of finite size, whether it be a single atom or collection of atoms.

But this is what I am trying to find out... "We" like to add impurities to help pin vortices, but what effect are we having on Tc (experimentally I know that the Tc will be reduced).

For magnetic impurities, the Abrikosov-Gorkov theory provides a pair breaking term alpha which takes into account the exchange energy between the electron spin and the magnetic impurity. This alpha is in terms of the concentration and contains a critical concentration for which superconductivity can not exist for any temperature. In this way, I can use the magnetic properties of the impurity with the concentration to calculate the effect on lowering Tc.

I would like a similar formula for a non-magnetic particle/impurity/ion. I would like a formula for which I can take the properties and concentration (and potentially the particle size) of the non-magnetic particle and roughly estimate the effect on Tc, whether that shift be .01, 1, or 10 degrees.

I suppose I should mention that I am interested in doing calculations for bulk samples, and not thin films or wires.

The point... If I am making a bulk superconductor, say like a pellet of MgB2, and I want to mix in a powder of non-magnetic impurities to increase pinning in the sample, but I also want to know how that would affect Tc. If I'm using a powder, what effect do I expect my choice of powder size (nano-powders versus micro-powders) to have on the reduction of Tc? I can look at the experimental results and see the Tc shifts will typically be small, but I assume there is a formula somewhere that estimates the relative shift in Tc, and that is what I am looking for.
 
I thought I would post this in case anyone comes across this post in the future and is looking for a similar result.

I found a paper that answers my question sufficiently.
Markowitz, D. and Kadanoff, L. P. (1963). Effects of impurities upon critical temperature of anisotropic superconductors. Physical Review, 131(2):563.

There is an appendix at the end of the article that contains a formulation for dTc if the scattering cross section and anisotropy interaction are known.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
854