In a Category with Fibered Products

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Euge
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the properties of morphisms in a category ##\mathscr{C}## where fibered products exist. It establishes that a morphism ##f : X \to Y## is a monomorphism if and only if the diagonal morphism ##\Delta_f : X \to X \times_Y X## is an isomorphism. Participants express their confidence in tackling postgraduate problems and share resources for further study in category theory, specifically recommending Steve Awodey's "Category Theory" and Emily Riehl's "Category Theory in Context".

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of morphisms in category theory
  • Familiarity with fibered products
  • Basic knowledge of abstract algebra
  • Optional: Background in topology
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of monomorphisms in category theory
  • Explore the concept of diagonal morphisms and their implications
  • Read Steve Awodey's "Category Theory" for foundational concepts
  • Investigate Emily Riehl's "Category Theory in Context" for practical applications
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, postgraduate students, and anyone interested in deepening their understanding of category theory and its applications in abstract algebra.

Euge
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
2,072
Reaction score
245
Let ##\mathscr{C}## be a category in which fibered products exist. If ##f : X \to Y## is a morphism in ##\mathscr{C}##, prove that ##f## is a monomorphism if and only if the diagonal morphism ##\Delta_f : X \to X\times_Y X## is an isomorphism.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark, anemone, malawi_glenn and 2 others
Physics news on Phys.org
I have actually done some category theory, so I might have a go at the problem.

"Only if" part:

We assume ##f## is monomorphic.

(i) Let ##p_1 : X \times_Y X \rightarrow X## and ##p_2 : X \times_Y X \rightarrow X## be the canonical projection morphisms. See figure A. We have ##f \circ p_1 = f \circ p_2##. As ##f## is monomorphic we have ##p_1 = p_2 = p##. Thus there is a unique ##p## such that ##p \circ \Delta_f = \text{id}_X##.

Figure A.jpg

Figure A

(ii) See figure B. By definition of a fibered product, ##\Delta_f \circ p## is uniquely determined. By (i) we have ##p \circ \Delta_f \circ p = p##, meaning that by the uniqueness of ##\Delta_f \circ p##, we have ##\Delta_f \circ p = \text{id}_{X \times_Y X}##.

Figure B.jpg

Figure B

"If" part:

We assume that ##\Delta_f## is an isomorphism.

We wish to prove that if ##f \circ \alpha = f \circ \beta## (i.e. figure C) then ##\alpha = \beta##, when ##\Delta_f## is an isomorphism.

Figure C.jpg

Figure C

First note: that as ##\Delta_f## is an isomorphism it has a unique inverse morphism, and as such ##p_1 = p_2 = p##.

See figure D. By definition of a fibered product, there is a unique morphism ##\xi : W \rightarrow X \times_Y X## such that ##\alpha = p_1 \circ \xi## and ##\beta = p_2 \circ \xi##. As ##p_1 = p_2 = p##, we have ##\alpha = p \circ \xi = \beta##.

Figure D.jpg

Figure D
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark, Greg Bernhardt, malawi_glenn and 1 other person
Thanks @julian for participating. Your solution is correct! So the postgraduate problems are not all beyond you. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: julian
Euge said:
Thanks @julian for participating. Your solution is correct! So the postgraduate problems are not all beyond you. :smile:
I guess I have read some graduate maths in my time. But reading graduate maths and doing problems are two different things. This gives me some confidence in at least trying the problems. I may not always solve them but I would probably learn some more maths in attempting doing so, which I guess is one of the main reasons for the problems!

This has given me incentive to go back and better understand category theory!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz, topsquark, Greg Bernhardt and 1 other person
Off topic. But any ideas for beginner books on cathegory theory and reasonable requirnents?
 
You can start with Steve Awodey's Category Theory and/or Emily Riehl's Category Theory in Context.

It would help to have some background knowledge in abstract algebra, at least at the undergraduate level. A topology background is also useful, but in my view not required.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ackbach and malawi_glenn

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
609
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K