In a Category with Fibered Products

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Euge
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around a problem in category theory involving fibered products and the characterization of monomorphisms through diagonal morphisms. Participants explore the implications of these concepts within the framework of category theory.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • Post 1 presents a problem statement regarding the conditions under which a morphism is a monomorphism based on the properties of the diagonal morphism.
  • Post 2 indicates a participant's confidence in tackling the problem due to prior experience with category theory.
  • Post 3 expresses agreement with a solution provided by another participant, reinforcing the notion that postgraduate problems can be approachable.
  • Post 4 reflects on the difference between reading graduate mathematics and solving problems, emphasizing the learning process involved in attempting challenging problems.
  • Post 5 shifts the topic slightly, asking for recommendations on beginner books in category theory and the necessary prerequisites.
  • Post 6 offers specific book recommendations and suggests that a background in abstract algebra is beneficial, while noting that a topology background is not strictly necessary.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no explicit consensus on the solution to the problem presented in Post 1, as the discussion includes varying levels of confidence and experience among participants. Additionally, the shift to book recommendations indicates a divergence from the original problem discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying levels of familiarity with category theory, which may influence their contributions and understanding of the problem. The discussion also highlights the distinction between theoretical knowledge and practical problem-solving skills.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals interested in category theory, particularly those seeking to understand the relationship between morphisms and fibered products, as well as those looking for introductory resources in the field.

Euge
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
2,072
Reaction score
245
Let ##\mathscr{C}## be a category in which fibered products exist. If ##f : X \to Y## is a morphism in ##\mathscr{C}##, prove that ##f## is a monomorphism if and only if the diagonal morphism ##\Delta_f : X \to X\times_Y X## is an isomorphism.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark, anemone, malawi_glenn and 2 others
Physics news on Phys.org
I have actually done some category theory, so I might have a go at the problem.

"Only if" part:

We assume ##f## is monomorphic.

(i) Let ##p_1 : X \times_Y X \rightarrow X## and ##p_2 : X \times_Y X \rightarrow X## be the canonical projection morphisms. See figure A. We have ##f \circ p_1 = f \circ p_2##. As ##f## is monomorphic we have ##p_1 = p_2 = p##. Thus there is a unique ##p## such that ##p \circ \Delta_f = \text{id}_X##.

Figure A.jpg

Figure A

(ii) See figure B. By definition of a fibered product, ##\Delta_f \circ p## is uniquely determined. By (i) we have ##p \circ \Delta_f \circ p = p##, meaning that by the uniqueness of ##\Delta_f \circ p##, we have ##\Delta_f \circ p = \text{id}_{X \times_Y X}##.

Figure B.jpg

Figure B

"If" part:

We assume that ##\Delta_f## is an isomorphism.

We wish to prove that if ##f \circ \alpha = f \circ \beta## (i.e. figure C) then ##\alpha = \beta##, when ##\Delta_f## is an isomorphism.

Figure C.jpg

Figure C

First note: that as ##\Delta_f## is an isomorphism it has a unique inverse morphism, and as such ##p_1 = p_2 = p##.

See figure D. By definition of a fibered product, there is a unique morphism ##\xi : W \rightarrow X \times_Y X## such that ##\alpha = p_1 \circ \xi## and ##\beta = p_2 \circ \xi##. As ##p_1 = p_2 = p##, we have ##\alpha = p \circ \xi = \beta##.

Figure D.jpg

Figure D
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark, Greg Bernhardt, malawi_glenn and 1 other person
Thanks @julian for participating. Your solution is correct! So the postgraduate problems are not all beyond you. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: julian
Euge said:
Thanks @julian for participating. Your solution is correct! So the postgraduate problems are not all beyond you. :smile:
I guess I have read some graduate maths in my time. But reading graduate maths and doing problems are two different things. This gives me some confidence in at least trying the problems. I may not always solve them but I would probably learn some more maths in attempting doing so, which I guess is one of the main reasons for the problems!

This has given me incentive to go back and better understand category theory!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz, topsquark, Greg Bernhardt and 1 other person
Off topic. But any ideas for beginner books on cathegory theory and reasonable requirnents?
 
You can start with Steve Awodey's Category Theory and/or Emily Riehl's Category Theory in Context.

It would help to have some background knowledge in abstract algebra, at least at the undergraduate level. A topology background is also useful, but in my view not required.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ackbach and malawi_glenn

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
815
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K