Understanding the Energy Differences in Multielectron Atom States

  • Thread starter Thread starter albertsmith
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atom
albertsmith
Messages
10
Reaction score
1
In a multielectron atom, the lowest-l state for each n (2s, 3s, 4s, etc.) is significantly lower in energy than the hydrogen state having the same n. But the highest-l state for each n (2p, 3d, 4f, etc.) is very nearly equal in energy to the hydrogen state with the same n. Explain?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Explain why you think this is the case.
 
Never heard about that. Can you specify a little bit more or give numbers?
 
In multi-electron atoms, the inner electrons hide (shield, screen) the full effect of the nuclear charge from the outer electron(s). This is especially true in atoms that have filled shells +1 electron, like lithium (2 + 1 =3 electrons), sodium (10 + 1 =11 electrons), and potassium (18 + 1 =19 electrons). The outer electron in these atoms effectively "sees" only one nuclear charge.
 
Last edited:
does the electron in a hydrogen atom ever go into the s subshell except for n=1. I thought (based on the zeeman effect) that the electron in a hydrogen atom only (or at least normally) transitioned between states where l=n-1.
 
Last edited:
Electrons are usually captured into high n states, most probably with high l (probability proportional to 2l+1), and as they cascade down, most electrons eventually end up cascading through l=n-1 states. This is why 4f-3d, and 3d-2p transitions are so bright. An electron could find itself stuck in the 2s state, and cannot get to the 1s state by the standard delta-l = +/- 1 rule. It does eventually get there by higher order effects, which allows it to get to the 2p state.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top