MHB What is the relationship between the incenter and orthocenter of a triangle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Albert1
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the geometric relationship between the incenter and orthocenter of a triangle, specifically regarding the angle between the extended line CH and HI, which is proposed to measure half of angle B. The conversation touches on the impossibility of trisecting an angle using only a non-graduated ruler and compass, although some specific angles can be trisected. The focus is on providing a geometric proof for the angle measurement in question. Participants are seeking hints and guidance to develop this proof. The exploration of these geometric properties highlights the complexities involved in triangle constructions.
Albert1
Messages
1,221
Reaction score
0
30kdffq.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What I see before 'attacking' the problem is that, without any serious failure of me, the 'demonstration' [if any...] would also demonstrate that trisection of an angle with only non graduate ruler and compass is possible... or not?... Kind regards $\chi$ $\sigma$
 
chisigma said:
trisection of an angle with only non graduate ruler and compass is possible... or not?...
It is impossible to trisect any angle with only non graduate ruler and compass ,but some angles are possible, and this is unrelated to this problem .
 
Last edited:
Albert said:
30kdffq.jpg
I need to show that the angle between $CH$(extended) and $HI$ measures $\frac{\angle B}{2}$. I am trying to give a purely geometric proof of this. Any hints on these lines?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top