Inclined plane problem without mass or coefficient of friction given

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem involving a Yukon Hammerhead sled on an icy incline, where mass and friction coefficients are not provided. Participants emphasize the importance of creating a free body diagram and recognizing that the net force acts parallel to the incline. They suggest using Newton's second law to find acceleration, noting that mass can be treated as a variable. Additionally, energy conservation is highlighted as a simpler method for solving the problem, indicating that the angle of the incline may not be necessary. Overall, the conversation focuses on alternative approaches to tackle the problem effectively.
ineedhelpthanks
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
A Yukon Hammerhead sled is at the top of an icy hill. The hill was conveniently measured by a surveyor who determined it to have an angle of 18° with the horizontal. Height of the hill is 25 m. What is the speed of the sled as it reaches the bottom of the hill?
Relevant Equations
I know I need to use kinematic equations to help find the speed.
I need to find fg to find the fnetx and fnety, but I’m confused how to approach this.
Confused how to approach problem after making a free body diagram and finding the length of the inclined plane
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So you made a free body diagram? Good! Realize that the net force will be parallel to the incline -- find that force, then use Newton's 2nd law to find the acceleration.
 
ineedhelpthanks said:
Homework Statement:: A Yukon Hammerhead sled is at the top of an icy hill.
I wonder what it means by "icy"?
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes berkeman and Doc Al
PeroK said:
I wonder what it means by "icy"?
Yeah, I think it’s regarding the friction. I think for the problem the friction is neglected
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK
Doc Al said:
So you made a free body diagram? Good! Realize that the net force will be parallel to the incline -- find that force, then use Newton's 2nd law to find the acceleration.
Okay, I’m not sure how f=ma would work without the mass though
 
ineedhelpthanks said:
Okay, I’m not sure how f=ma would work without the mass though
Just call the mass "m" and see what happens. You might not need it to find the acceleration. (The expression for force will also involve the mass.)
 
Were you told to use kinematics to solve this? Energy conservation is easier.
 
hutchphd said:
Energy conservation is easier.
And you don't even need the angle!
 
  • Like
Likes ineedhelpthanks
hutchphd said:
Were you told to use kinematics to solve this? Energy conservation is easier.
The right kinematic equation (the one that does not involve ##t##) works just as well.
 
Back
Top