Increase dielectric strength of a cylindrical capacitor

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around enhancing the dielectric strength of a coaxial cylindrical capacitor designed to operate at 5 kV and 10 kHz, which is experiencing breakdown when subjected to 10 kV at the same frequency. Participants explore various methods to achieve this increased voltage tolerance while maintaining the capacitor's operational frequency.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest coating the capacitor tubes with copper oxide (CuO) to increase dielectric strength, while questioning the impact of CuO's permittivity on frequency transmission.
  • Others propose using nitric acid to remove a thin layer of copper, thereby increasing the gap distance between the cylinders to accommodate higher voltage.
  • Another idea involves replacing copper tubes with zinc tubes, raising questions about the effects of material change on performance.
  • Participants discuss the vagueness of the term "vacuum" and the potential influence of the Paschen curve on breakdown voltage, suggesting adjustments to the vacuum or using inert gases.
  • There is a consideration of using alternative dielectrics, such as oil, plastic, or porcelain, and the implications of these materials on capacitance and signal transmission.
  • One participant expresses skepticism about the ability of a thin oxide layer to withstand high voltages, indicating a need for a more robust dielectric solution.
  • Questions arise regarding the expected capacitance of a practical 5 kV concentric cylinder capacitor and the relevance of the proposed solutions to the problem at hand.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best approach to increase the dielectric strength of the capacitor. Multiple competing views and methods are presented, with ongoing questions about the implications of each proposed solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in the problem statement, particularly regarding the definition of "vacuum" and its implications for dielectric breakdown. There is also uncertainty about the effects of different materials and coatings on the capacitor's performance.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to students and professionals in electrical engineering, materials science, and physics, particularly those focused on capacitor design and dielectric materials.

gao7857
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


You have a co-axial cylindrical capacitor placed in vacuum. The two co-axial cylinder tubes are made of copper. The outside tube radius a1 and inside tube radius a2, with overlapping length L; both tubes have a thickness of t. Say, the capacitor was designed to withstand 5 kV voltage at 10 kHz. Now you are applying 10 kV at same 10 kHz, and you see a breakdown. Assume a1, a2 and L are fixed. The question is: How can you make the capacitor work for 10 kV at 10 kHz?

Homework Equations


C=epsilon*A/d


The Attempt at a Solution


(1) dip the capacitor tubes in sodium hydroxide, then oven-heat it, to turn surface copper into a thin layer of copper oxide (CuO). CuO has larger dielectric strength, so it can withstand higher voltage. Issue: CuO has larger permittivity and will this affect the frequency transmission?
(2) dip the capacitor tubes in nitric acid, to remove a thin layer of the copper, so the gap distance between two cylinders increased a little, affording a larger voltage.
(3) coat the tubes with a thin layer of zinc. Similar idea as in attempt (1).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
gao7857 said:

Homework Statement


You have a co-axial cylindrical capacitor placed in vacuum. The two co-axial cylinder tubes are made of copper. The outside tube radius a1 and inside tube radius a2, with overlapping length L; both tubes have a thickness of t. Say, the capacitor was designed to withstand 5 kV voltage at 10 kHz. Now you are applying 10 kV at same 10 kHz, and you see a breakdown. Assume a1, a2 and L are fixed. The question is: How can you make the capacitor work for 10 kV at 10 kHz?

Homework Equations


C=epsilon*A/d


The Attempt at a Solution


(1) dip the capacitor tubes in sodium hydroxide, then oven-heat it, to turn surface copper into a thin layer of copper oxide (CuO). CuO has larger dielectric strength, so it can withstand higher voltage. Issue: CuO has larger permittivity and will this affect the frequency transmission?
(2) dip the capacitor tubes in nitric acid, to remove a thin layer of the copper, so the gap distance between two cylinders increased a little, affording a larger voltage.
(3) coat the tubes with a thin layer of zinc. Similar idea as in attempt (1).

I think you are on the right track with the coatings.

Also, the use of the term "vacuum" in the problem statement is a bit vague. Think about how the Paschen Curve can have an effect...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paschen_curve

.
 
Thanks Berkeman,

You are right about the Paschen curve. I should say that the vacuum is at the lower end of the curve. (say, an other attempt could be to adjust the vacuum to either a small tor or a higher pressure with an inert gas, if the original vacuum was not at the optional level)

I have another thought. How about change the material from copper to zinc: repalce the copper tubes with zinc tubes?

Thanks,
gao

berkeman said:
I think you are on the right track with the coatings.

Also, the use of the term "vacuum" in the problem statement is a bit vague. Think about how the Paschen Curve can have an effect...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paschen_curve

.
 
gao7857 said:
Thanks Berkeman,

You are right about the Paschen curve. I should say that the vacuum is at the lower end of the curve. (say, an other attempt could be to adjust the vacuum to either a small tor or a higher pressure with an inert gas, if the original vacuum was not at the optional level)

I have another thought. How about change the material from copper to zinc: repalce the copper tubes with zinc tubes?

Thanks,
gao

The idea of oxide growth is analogous to the electrolytic capacitor, though in the electrolytic the oxide insulator/dielectric is continually maintained by electrolytic action.

It seems to me that this self-maintenance function would be absent with the CuO layer, though beyond that I offer no opinion.

Is an oil or plastic or porcelain dielectric not feasible?

How would changing the conductor change things?
 
Do you have an oil in your mind?

Basically, the capacitor, which was designed for 5 kV 10 kHz, is expect to work for 10 kV 10 kHz.

Another question, if add/change material (oil dielectric or zinc coating or CuO coating or zinc tube), will the signal/frequency transmission be affected (e.g. out of phase)? What else will change?

Thanks

NascentOxygen said:
The idea of oxide growth is analogous to the electrolytic capacitor, though in the electrolytic the oxide insulator/dielectric is continually maintained by electrolytic action.

It seems to me that this self-maintenance function would be absent with the CuO layer, though beyond that I offer no opinion.

Is an oil or plastic or porcelain dielectric not feasible?

How would changing the conductor change things?
 
I don't have a particular oil or synthetic fluid in mind, so with no better leads to go on, if I had to I'd look at transformer oil and see what its properties are, then proceed from there. Whatever you add will increase the capacitance, though this is probably inconsequential.

10 kHz is audio frequency. What property would you hope may change were you to provide a different metal either side of the gap? Do you have any equations relevant to the task that reflect a different value for different metals?

As it stands, the air gap is withstanding 5kV and you need something else to withstand the other 5kV. I can't see a thin oxide/chemical layer withstanding even a few hundred volts.

I've been out of electrical power for many years, so take what I say as not even worth the paper it's written on. :shy: Have you googled for liquid dielectrics? It makes it easy when all you are concerned with is dielectric strength, as here, with no concern for permittivity.

I'd be interested in knowing how many uF a practical 5kV concentric cylinder capacitor like this can be expected to have, and to what use it would be put. Is the "attempted solution" something you came up with, or is it integral to the problem?

Have you worked out how wide the gap would be in a vacuum to just withstand 5kV? This would give you a feel for the dimensions you are dealing with.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K