Increase Dipper Frequency - Wave Velocity & Pattern Changes

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kyoma
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frequency Waves
Click For Summary
Increasing the frequency of a dipper in a ripple tank results in waves that are closer together, as higher frequency corresponds to shorter wavelengths while wave velocity remains constant due to the properties of the medium. The velocity of waves in a non-dispersive medium, like water, is determined by the medium itself and does not change with frequency. In contrast, in dispersive media, wave velocity can depend on frequency, as seen with light in a prism. Introductory physics often simplifies this by stating that wave velocity is constant in a given medium, which holds true for water waves. Understanding these principles clarifies why the correct answer to the initial question is that waves become closer together with increased frequency.
Kyoma
Messages
95
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A dipper moving up and down makes waves in a ripple tank.
What will happen when the dipper frequency is increased?

(a) The waves will be closer together.
(b) The waves will move more quickly across the tank.

2. The attempt at a solution

From the equation, velocity of wave = frequency of wave multiply by the wavelength, I choose (b) since when frequency is increased, so will the velocity. However, the answer is (a). Why? Why is velocity held constant?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Good question Kyoma, this is a topic that is rarely explained well in intro physics classes. In situations like this (but not necessarily always) the velocity of propagation of a wave is a property of the material itself. I.e. the type/features of the wave don't matter, the velocity is always the same---because the water is the same. The wave-speed is a property of the water (for the record, this would be called a "non-dispersive" medium, because of this feature).

In your proposed solution you said that the, "frequency is increased"--you're right of course, and this is just another way of saying 'a'! Higher frequency means smaller wavelength (because of that equation---with constant velocity), and thus closer together wave-peaks.

Does that make sense?
 
So, there are some situations in which the velocity depends on the property of the material, then what kind of situations? Common sense?
 
Kyoma said:
So, there are some situations in which the velocity depends on the property of the material, then what kind of situations? Common sense?

The velocity always depends on the material, for example the velocity of soundwaves in air is slower than the velocity of soundwaves in water, which is slower than the velocity in a solid. However, there are situations where the velocity also depends on the frequency. When this is the case we speak of a dispersive medium. An example of this is the breaking of light in a prism, where the velocity of the lightwaves moving through the prism depends on the frequency, thus leading to the refractive index depending on frequency, which, along with the geometry of the prism, leads to the spatial sparation of the components of white light.
 
I still don't understand, really.

I have checked a couple of physics forums. Some claimed that velocity of a wave will increase when frequency increases, while others claimed that velocity will always be held constant in a particular medium... :l
 
In the cases that you will discuss in an introductory physics class, the velocity will remain constant independent of frequency. This is exactly true in some cases and only a (usually pretty good) approximation in others.
However, statement (a) of your original question is always true, whether you treat things exactly with more messy math or take the easy approximation.
If you want to see a more complete discussions of water waves, you can check out this Wikipedia page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dispersion_(water_waves )
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K