Increases in stresses and settlement to an existing building due to a new one

  • Thread starter Thread starter jessikat_93
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Building
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a geotechnical engineering homework problem involving the potential settlement and stress increases on an existing building due to the construction of a new office building nearby. The key parameters include soil properties, building dimensions, and load distributions. The student is seeking guidance on calculating the interaction effects between the two buildings, specifically how to determine the influence of one building on the other. They mention using settlement influence factors and vertical elastic settlement calculations but are unsure about interpreting pressure bulb graphs. The conversation highlights the need for clarity on these calculations to address concerns from the existing building's owners.
jessikat_93
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
1. I have been given a homework problem for my geotechnical engineering course and to be honest I don't even know where to start, I was hoping someone could give me a few hints as to where I should start.

The question is:

You are the geotechnical engineer for a proposed office building in a densely clustered city. The office building will be constructed adjacent to the existing office complex. The soil of the site is a deposit of very dense sand with E=E′=45 MPa and ν=ν′=0.3. The sand rests on a deep deposit of dense gravel. The existing high rise complex is founded on a concrete slab 100m x 120m located 2m below the ground surface, and transmits a load of 2400 MN to the soil. Your office foundation is 50m x 80m and transmits a load of 1000 MN. You also intended to locate your foundation at 2m below ground level. The front of your building is aligned with the existing office complex, and the side distance is 0.5m. The lesser dimension of each building is the frontal dimension. The owners of the existing building are concerned about the possible settlement of their building due to your building. You are invited to a meeting with your client, the owners of the exiting building and their technical staff. You are expected to determine what effects your office building would have on the exiting building. You only have one hour to make the preliminary calculations. You are expected to present the estimated increase in stresses and settlement of the exiting complex will due to construction of your office building. Prepare your analysis and presentation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have been working on the question and found that I can find the settlement influence factor for each building and the vertical elastic settlement for each building as well as the increase in stresses for each building, however, I need to find how one building influences the other. I have found a pressure bulb graph in my textbook, however, I don't know how to correctly read it or if it is even relevant to the question. Please help me :)
 
Hi,
I have a similar question i have been posed with. Did you work out how to do it? Would love to hear if you have.

Regards
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
10K
Back
Top