Increasing AC Mains Current to 1-2 A for Physics Lab Expt.

AI Thread Summary
To achieve the required 1-2 A current for the hysteresis curve experiment, options discussed include using a transformer or an amplifier to boost the feeble 30 mA available from the AC mains. The conversation highlights the need for clarification on the voltage and type of current (AC or DC) necessary for the experiment. Participants express confusion about the current specifications and the implications of using 120 Vrms. There is a suggestion that a fundamental understanding of Ohm's Law (V=IR) is essential for effective troubleshooting. Overall, the focus remains on finding a practical solution to increase the current for the physics lab experiment.
mkbh_10
Messages
217
Reaction score
0
In my physics lab , we do our expt. : analysis of HYSTERESIS curve which requires a current of 1-2 A to magnetise the solenoid , now we have a ready made instrument for getting that value of current .

So what could i do manually in order to get that magnitude of current from AC mains which has a feeble current of around 30 mA.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
use a transformer, or an amplifier.
 
mkbh_10 said:
In my physics lab , we do our expt. : analysis of HYSTERESIS curve which requires a current of 1-2 A to magnetise the solenoid , now we have a ready made instrument for getting that value of current .

1-2A at what voltage? AC or DC?

mkbh_10 said:
So what could i do manually in order to get that magnitude of current from AC mains which has a feeble current of around 30 mA.

What do you mean by 30mA? You only have 30mA at 120Vrms available (why?), or you only need 30mA at some AC or DC voltage (what voltage?) for some variation on the experiment?
 
berkeman said:
1-2A at what voltage? AC or DC?



What do you mean by 30mA? You only have 30mA at 120Vrms available (why?), or you only need 30mA at some AC or DC voltage (what voltage?) for some variation on the experiment?

Dude, if he doesn't know V=IR, why would he know what 120Vrms meant?
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.

Similar threads

Back
Top