Increasing/ Decreasing of a Sequence

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the monotonicity and boundedness of two sequences, specifically 4n/(4n² + 1) and 2n/(4n + 1). For the first sequence, the derivative indicates it is always increasing, as there are no critical points where the derivative equals zero. The second sequence is found to be decreasing through the ratio test, although the user initially struggled with confirming this without test values. The importance of using derivatives correctly and evaluating behavior at specific points is emphasized, leading to the conclusion that the first sequence approaches infinity while the second approaches zero. Overall, understanding the behavior of these sequences relies on analyzing derivatives and applying appropriate tests.
trap101
Messages
339
Reaction score
0
Determine the monotonicity and boundedness of the sequence.

1) 4n/ (4n2 + 1)22) 2n/ 4n + 1Question: I'm having a problem in knowing whether the approach I'm using is providing the right solutions.

in 1) I used the an+1/an and tried to compare their ratios. I end up with: 4n+4/ (4n2 + 8n + 5)1/2 . Now I know this will be less than 1 when I use a few "test values" such as n = 1, 2, etc. But how am I certain that the direction of the sequence won't eventually change?

If I take the derivative of the original sequence I end up with (after simplifying): 16n2 - 2n + 4 = 0. In that equation I can't find any critical points so is it safe to say that the sequence is always increasing based on that logic?In 2) I did the an+1/an approach and got it was decreasing. But only was I was able to conclude that was from putting in "test values" at the end again. This is when I simplified the ratio to: 2(4n+1)/ 4n+1 +1. I tried to find the derivative and get critical points but I couldn't find anything. What should I do in this case?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try finding the derivative of 4x/(4x2 + 1)2 again.
 
Bohrok said:
Try finding the derivative of 4x/(4x2 + 1)2 again.


My mistake, it was actually suppose to be 4x/(4x2 + 1)1/2
 
Well find the derivative of that, and what do you get?
 
I get 16n2-2n + 4 = 0


which when i tried to solve for roots i could not find any, even using the -b + (b2- 4ac)1/2/2a formula.
 
I'm not sure how you're getting that; try it one more time. Remember that (f/g)' = (gf' - fg')/g2
 
Bohrok said:
I'm not sure how you're getting that; try it one more time. Remember that (f/g)' = (gf' - fg')/g2

Maybe I should explain how I'm getting that. So after I differentiate I get this:

4(4n2+1)1/2 - 4n(1/2(4n2+1)-1/2) / (4n2+1) = 0


and then I simplify everything and end up with what I got above. Then to solve for possible critical points I used the quadratic formula, which doesn't work.
 
trap101 said:
Maybe I should explain how I'm getting that. So after I differentiate I get this:

4(4n2+1)1/2 - 4n(1/2(4n2+1)-1/2) / (4n2+1) = 0


and then I simplify everything and end up with what I got above. Then to solve for possible critical points I used the quadratic formula, which doesn't work.


Blimey! I forgot to apply the chain rule to the inside. Ok, but now I ended up with 4 = 0 as my simplified expression. What does that indicate?
 
trap101 said:
Blimey! I forgot to apply the chain rule to the inside. OK, but now I ended up with 4 = 0 as my simplified expression. What does that indicate?
That means that the equation has no solution. In this particular case it means that the derivative is not zero anywhere.

Since the function, 4x/(4x2 + 1)(1/2), is differentiable for all real numbers, what does the fact that its derivative is never zero tell you?
 
  • #10
SammyS said:
That means that the equation has no solution. In this particular case it means that the derivative is not zero anywhere.

Since the function, 4x/(4x2 + 1)(1/2), is differentiable for all real numbers, what does the fact that its derivative is never zero tell you?



Well when I was looking over some other questions that I'm having the similar problems with what I noticed is that it indicates that either the sequence is increasing or decreasing through out. To find out which one it does exactly, are you able to just take a couple test values and plug them into observe the behavior? i.e n= 1, 2, 3, etc. Since you know it has to go in only one direction
 
  • #11
trap101 said:
Well when I was looking over some other questions that I'm having the similar problems with what I noticed is that it indicates that either the sequence is increasing or decreasing through out. To find out which one it does exactly, are you able to just take a couple test values and plug them into observe the behavior? i.e n= 1, 2, 3, etc. Since you know it has to go in only one direction
That will work, or evaluate the derivative at anyone point, since it doesn't change sign.
 
  • #12
Thanks. One other quick question about types of sequences:

2n/ 4n+1

How do I handle this sort of sequence? I tried the an+1/an approach, but I don't think it's conclusive. When I take the derivative I end up with :

(2n)(4n)(ln 2 - ln 4) = 0

this is after setting the respective powers to eln.

How do I determine behavior from here?
 
  • #13
trap101 said:
Thanks. One other quick question about types of sequences:

2n/ 4n+1

How do I handle this sort of sequence? I tried the an+1/an approach, but I don't think it's conclusive. When I take the derivative I end up with :

(2n)(4n)(ln 2 - ln 4) = 0

this is after setting the respective powers to eln.

How do I determine behavior from here?

You don't have to take any derivatives at all. Just divide numerator and denominator by 2^n. The answer will depend on whether you are asking about 2^n/4^n+1 or 2^n/(4^n+1).
 
  • #14
Dick said:
You don't have to take any derivatives at all. Just divide numerator and denominator by 2^n. The answer will depend on whether you are asking about 2^n/4^n+1 or 2^n/(4^n+1).

I don't fully understand what you mean by dividing by 2n. So if I divide everything by 2n I should get something of this form:

1 / 2n + (1/2n)

Now since this is a sequence I'm only concerned with values of n ≥ 1. With that being the case, the fraction will go to zero eventually...Is that the right interpretation?
 
  • #15
trap101 said:
I don't fully understand what you mean by dividing by 2n. So if I divide everything by 2n I should get something of this form:

1 / 2n + (1/2n)

Now since this is a sequence I'm only concerned with values of n ≥ 1. With that being the case, the fraction will go to zero eventually...Is that the right interpretation?

Yes, it goes to zero. To show it's decreasing you just have to show the denominator is increasing.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K