Indefinite Integrals & The Net Change Theorem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the evaluation of indefinite integrals in the context of the Net Change Theorem, specifically focusing on the relationship between velocity, displacement, and total distance traveled by a particle over a specified interval.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the integration of a velocity function to determine displacement and total distance, questioning the impact of negative velocity on these calculations. There are attempts to clarify the distinction between displacement and total distance traveled.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering insights and corrections to each other's reasoning. There is an ongoing exploration of how to correctly calculate the total distance traveled by considering both forward and backward motion, with some participants suggesting methods to integrate over specific intervals.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding the definitions of displacement and total distance, as well as the implications of integrating a velocity function that changes sign. Participants are working within the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information available for discussion.

MitsuShai
Messages
159
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement







2. The attempt at a solution

I integrated the velocity equation and got this: s(t)= sin(t) + (1/2)x

1. [sin(pi)+(1/2)(pi)] - [sin(0)+(1/2)(0)]
= pi/2

2. [sin(pi)+(1/2)(pi)] + [sin(0)+(1/2)(0)]
= pi/2

The first answer is right but the second one isn't
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Number one is right. The problem with two is that at e.g. v(pi)=(-1/2). So the particle is traveling backwards part of the time.
 
Dick said:
Number one is right. The problem with two is that at e.g. v(pi)=(-1/2). So the particle is traveling backwards part of the time.

But even if it's traveling backwards, it does not effect the total distance right? Because that will effect the displacement.
 
MitsuShai said:
But even if it's traveling backwards, it does not effect the total distance right? Because that will effect the displacement.

You've got that backwards. Displacement is the total distance between the starting point and the ending point. It doesn't matter how you got from the start to the end. How you did does affect the total distance travelled.
 
Dick said:
You've got that backwards. Displacement is the total distance between the starting point and the ending point. It doesn't matter how you got from the start to the end. How you did does affect the total distance travelled.

ok then, but I still can't think of a way to solve it.
 
MitsuShai said:
ok then, but I still can't think of a way to solve it.

Find out at what time the particle switches from going forward to backwards by solving v(t)=0. Then add the distance it travels forward to the distance it travels backward.
 
Dick said:
Find out at what time the particle switches from going forward to backwards by solving v(t)=0. Then add the distance it travels forward to the distance it travels backward.

v(t)=cos(t)+(1/2)=0
cos (t)= -1/2
t=2pi/3

[sin(0)+(1/2)(0)] + [sin(2pi/3)+(1/2)(2pi/3)]
0 + squareroot(3)/2 + pi/6...
 
MitsuShai said:
v(t)=cos(t)+(1/2)=0
cos (t)= -1/2
t=2pi/3

[sin(0)+(1/2)(0)] + [sin(2pi/3)+(1/2)(2pi/3)]
0 + squareroot(3)/2 + pi/6...

(1/2)(2pi/3)=pi/3. So if you mean sqrt(3)/2+pi/3, then, yes, that's the distance it travels forward. Now how far does it travel backwards?
 
Dick said:
(1/2)(2pi/3)=pi/3. So if you mean sqrt(3)/2+pi/3, then, yes, that's the distance it travels forward. Now how far does it travel backwards?

that was only the forward one; i thought I was solving for both. ok let's see now:
[sin(2pi/3)+(1/2)(2pi/3)] + [sin(pi)+(1/2)(pi)]
sqrt(3)/2+pi/3 + 0
=sqrt(3)/2+pi/3

forward + backward=
(sqrt(3)/2+pi/3) + (sqrt(3)/2+pi/3)
2(sqrt(3)/2+pi/3)
 
  • #10
MitsuShai said:
that was only the forward one; i thought I was solving for both. ok let's see now:
[sin(2pi/3)+(1/2)(2pi/3)] + [sin(pi)+(1/2)(pi)]
sqrt(3)/2+pi/3 + 0
=sqrt(3)/2+pi/3

forward + backward=
(sqrt(3)/2+pi/3) + (sqrt(3)/2+pi/3)
2(sqrt(3)/2+pi/3)

To get the backwards distance you are integrating v(t) from 2pi/3 to pi and then reversing the sign since you know the result will be negative, and you want the positive distance, right? So shouldn't [sin(2pi/3)+(1/2)(2pi/3)] + [sin(pi)+(1/2)(pi)] be [sin(2pi/3)+(1/2)(2pi/3)] - [sin(pi)+(1/2)(pi)]??
 
  • #11
Dick said:
To get the backwards distance you are integrating v(t) from 2pi/3 to pi and then reversing the sign since you know the result will be negative, and you want the positive distance, right? So shouldn't [sin(2pi/3)+(1/2)(2pi/3)] + [sin(pi)+(1/2)(pi)] be [sin(2pi/3)+(1/2)(2pi/3)] - [sin(pi)+(1/2)(pi)]??

oh yeah that's right, but won't you still end up with the same answer?
sqrt(3)/2+pi/3

then add the forward distance with the backward distance? But then the answer turns out weird...
 
  • #12
MitsuShai said:
oh yeah that's right, but won't you still end up with the same answer?
sqrt(3)/2+pi/3

then add the forward distance with the backward distance? But then the answer turns out weird...

No, I don't get sqrt(3)/2+pi/3 for the backwards distance. The difference between the forward distance and the backwards distance should be the displacement, right? It's not zero. Try the backwards distance again.
 
  • #13
Dick said:
No, I don't get sqrt(3)/2+pi/3 for the backwards distance. The difference between the forward distance and the backwards distance should be the displacement, right? It's not zero. Try the backwards distance again.

[sin(2pi/3)+(1/2)(2pi/3)] - [sin(pi)+(1/2)(pi)]
[squareroot(3)/2 + pi/3] - [0+ pi/2] ---sorry about that I assumed it was zero because of the forward direction one, that was a stupid mistake

squareroot(3)/2 + pi/3 - pi/2
squareroot(3)/2 -pi/6

forward + backwards=
sqrt(3)/2+pi/3 + squareroot(3)/2 -pi/6
2(sqrt(3)/2)+ 3pi/18
= sqrt(3) + 3pi/18
 
  • #14
MitsuShai said:
[sin(2pi/3)+(1/2)(2pi/3)] - [sin(pi)+(1/2)(pi)]
[squareroot(3)/2 + pi/3] - [0+ pi/2] ---sorry about that I assumed it was zero because of the forward direction one, that was a stupid mistake

squareroot(3)/2 + pi/3 - pi/2
squareroot(3)/2 -pi/6

forward + backwards=
sqrt(3)/2+pi/3 + squareroot(3)/2 -pi/6
2(sqrt(3)/2)+ 3pi/18
= sqrt(3) + 3pi/18

That's better. You can simplify 3pi/18 to pi/6. But now I think it's right.
 
  • #15
Dick said:
That's better. You can simplify 3pi/18 to pi/6. But now I think it's right.

Thank you so much; it is right :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K