Indefinite Integration by exchange of variables

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 1K views
Asphyxiated
Messages
263
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This is only an example but I do not understand what they are doing...

[tex]\int (4x+1)^{3} + (4x+1)^{2}+(4x+1) dx[/tex]


Homework Equations



[tex]\int f(u) du = F(g(x)) + C[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



Let

[tex]u = 4x+1[/tex]

then

[tex]du = 4 dx[/tex]

and

[tex]dx = \frac {1}{4}du[/tex]

how did they get that dx was 1/4? There are no steps to explain this, it just lists them as having that value.

So after substituting the problem should look like this:

[tex]\int (u^{3} + u^{2} + u) * \frac {1}{4} du[/tex]

which is this:

[tex]\frac{1}{4}(\frac{u^{4}}{4} + \frac {u^{3}}{3} + \frac {u^{2}}{2}) + C[/tex]

[tex]\frac{1}{4}[\frac {(4x+1)^{4}}{4}+\frac{(4x+1)^{3}}{3}+\frac{(4x+1)^{2}}{2}] +C[/tex]

So I suppose the only portion that I really don't understand is how they got the 1/4 dx value out of seemingly nothing...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Asphyxiated said:

Homework Statement



This is only an example but I do not understand what they are doing...

[tex]\int (4x+1)^{3} + (4x+1)^{2}+(4x+1) dx[/tex]


Homework Equations



[tex]\int f(u) du = F(g(x)) + C[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



Let

[tex]u = 4x+1[/tex]

then

[tex]du = 4 dx[/tex]

and

[tex]dx = \frac {1}{4}du[/tex]

how did they get that dx was 1/4? There are no steps to explain this, it just lists them as having that value.

So after substituting the problem should look like this:

[tex]\int (u^{3} + u^{2} + u) * \frac {1}{4} du[/tex]

which is this:

[tex]\frac{1}{4}(\frac{u^{4}}{4} + \frac {u^{3}}{3} + \frac {u^{2}}{2}) + C[/tex]

[tex]\frac{1}{4}[\frac {(4x+1)^{4}}{4}+\frac{(4x+1)^{3}}{3}+\frac{(4x+1)^{2}}{2}] +C[/tex]

So I suppose the only portion that I really don't understand is how they got the 1/4 dx value out of seemingly nothing...

[tex]du = 4 dx[/tex] solve this for [tex]dx[/tex]
 
I guess I just didn't really think about it all that hard... I got another question though, but Ill post it in a new thread
 
Your solution is correct.
 
There appears to be many notations and definitions of "dy" where y is a dummy variable. Some authors chose to define dy, while others leave it at "no meaning". I came across one interpretation that might help you...

du/dx = 4 = 4 dx/dx

So, (1/4) du/dx = dx/dx

By suppressing the denominator, we get,

(1/4) du = dx

Keeping in mind that the denominator is still there. That is, "dy" is shorthand for "dy/dx".

I like this interpretation because it does not appear to manipulate du/dx like a fraction.

Hope this helps!