Indented contour integration + applying jordans lemma

  • Thread starter Thread starter MM360
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating a real integral involving the expression [cos(x) - 1]/(x^2) using contour integration techniques, particularly focusing on the application of Jordan's lemma and the behavior of integrals around singularities.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of the exponential form of cosine and the need to split the integral. There are questions about the reasoning behind why one integral evaluates to zero while another does not. Some participants explore the implications of removable singularities and the necessity of indenting contours in complex analysis.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes various attempts to clarify the reasoning behind the integrals' evaluations. Some participants have provided insights into residue calculations and contour indentation, while others are still seeking a deeper understanding of the underlying concepts. One participant has indicated that they have found clarity with the help of their lecturer.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of an upcoming exam, which may influence the urgency and focus of the participants' inquiries. The discussion also reflects a mix of familiarity with the topic and uncertainty regarding specific aspects of contour integration.

MM360
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi I am new on here so I am just writing out the question.

Real integral ie from - infinity to + infinity of [cos(x) -1]/(x^2)

2. Homework Equations + solution attempt
I know you have to use the exp cosx idenity and then split the integral.
also it has a removable singularity at z =0 and also the contour has to be indented
I have the ans for this question but my main problem is how this happens

integral of [exp(iz) - 1]/2(z^2) = 0

but the integral of

[exp(-iz)-1]/2(z^2) = pi ( once residue thoerm is applied)

Also could anyone please explain how to apply Jordans lemma to these kind of questions

I have exams soon so any help would be much appreciated :smile:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know this for you is useful or not?

Try using this formula to match it.

Res(f,a)=1/(m-1)!lim(z→a)〖d(m-1)/〖dz〗(m-1) 〗 [(z-a)mf(z)]

m is the pole of the order;a is pole.

After that, give your answer as:

integral of f(z)=2(pi)i(∑n(j=1)〖Res(f;zj)〗)
 
Last edited:
thanks for the reply - but I am fine with calculating the residue - its the reasoning of why the first integral i mentioned goes to 0

its easier to expand the top in its Taylor expansion and divide to get a residue of i/2pi - this is not a problem only the reasoning
 
I used cosx = 1/2[exp(ix) + exp(-ix)]

x and z are just dummy variables so that is correct - even the solution has the same thing

its just the indenting contour reasoning I am stuck on
 
If not going wrong:

:redface: no ! the first integral where got 0 ?:smile:

Are you trouble at e0 is equal to 1 .:-p

If not, i am sorry about that because this sem my exam also going with this topic.:shy:
 
Last edited:
By the triangle inequality we have
\left|\frac{exp(iz) - 1}{2z^2}\right | \leq \frac{1}{|z|^2}
whence the conclusion follows by a simple estimate on the first integral.
 
The idea in that the singularity is on the contour, and so to counter that you make a small indentation in the form of a semi-circle of radius \varepsilon so that the singularity is outside the contour. You just examine what this gives, it looks to be quite an easy calculation in your case.

This sort of problem has popped up in my research, which is why I know about it. Complex analysis is very useful for waves.
 
Thanks everyone for the help/replies

I have found the reason why and my lecturer has confirmed it

so i understand it now
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K