A Independence of generalized coordinates and generalized velocities

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the independence of generalized coordinates and velocities within the framework of Lagrangian mechanics. It emphasizes that the Lagrangian's functional form is analyzed to derive the Euler Lagrange equations, where coordinates and their time derivatives are treated as independent variables. The example provided illustrates a simple Lagrangian, showing how to express it mathematically with independent variables. The conversation also touches on the challenge of accessing previous posts for further clarification. Overall, the independence of these variables is crucial for studying the dynamics in phase space diagrams.
VVS2000
Messages
150
Reaction score
17
TL;DR Summary
I was studying the derivation of the lagrangian formalism from Goldstein's textbook for mechanics and at one point they made a claim that generalized co-ordinates and velocities are independent and the derivative of one with respect to the other is zero.
How can I make sense of this and further how to think of this in the context of phase space diagrams?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This question has been asked a number of times. Lagrangian mechanics analyses the functional form of the Lagrangian in order to derive the Euler Lagrange equations. At which point the coordinates and derivatives revert to their usual role, with one the time derivative of the other.

If you search my recent posts for the text in italics you should find a more complete answer.
 
PeroK said:
This question has been asked a number of times. Lagrangian mechanics analyses the functional form of the Lagrangian in order to derive the Euler Lagrange equations. At which point the coordinates and derivatives revert to their usual role, with one the time derivative of the other.

If you search my recent posts for the text in italics you should find a more complete answer.
Well you're apparently a P-F galaxy so can you provide the link to your post regarding this topic?
 
VVS2000 said:
Well you're apparently a P-F galaxy so can you provide the link to your post regarding this topic?
I've never found a way to do it from my phone.
 
PeroK said:
I've never found a way to do it from my phone.
Ok, if not too much trouble, can you explain how they're independent here itself?
 
VVS2000 said:
Ok, if not too much trouble, can you explain how they're independent here itself?
You treat them as independent variables and study the functional form of the Lagrangian. In the simplest case you have$$L(x,\dot x) = \frac 1 2 m\dot x^2 - V(x)$$Effectively what you do is say, okay, let's study a function of the form$$L(X,Y) = \frac 1 2 mY^2 - V(X)$$That's perfectly legitimate mathematically.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top