Index gymnastics of electromagnetism quantities

coleman123
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
This bothers me, and the question is simple:

If am working with a non-minkowski metric g, when raising or lowering indexes of electromagnetism quantities, for example the electromagnetic tensor F, or the vector potential A, should I use my curved spacetime metric g or the minkowski metric n?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The actual metric. The Minkowski metric is at best an approximation to the curved-spacetime metric.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thanks!
 
coleman123 said:
If am working with a non-minkowski metric g, when raising or lowering indexes of electromagnetism quantities, for example the electromagnetic tensor F, or the vector potential A, should I use my curved spacetime metric g or the minkowski metric n?

Coordinate indices are raised and lowered with ##g## but tetrad indices are raised and lowered using ##\eta##, be it curved space-time or flat space-time.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
747
Replies
3
Views
175
Replies
26
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
4K
Back
Top