Index Gymnastics: Tensor Product of 4-Vectors & Tensors

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Milsomonk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Index
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the tensor product of a general 4-vector, denoted as ## g^{\mu} ##, and a rank two tensor, ## P^{\mu\nu} ##, in Minkowski space. The correct formulation of the tensor product results in a rank three tensor, expressed as ## T^{\mu\nu\sigma} = g^\mu P^{\nu\sigma} ##. To achieve a single index output, one must contract the vector with the tensor by lowering an index using the metric ## \eta_{\mu\nu} ##. This process clarifies that the term "tensor product" may be misleading when expecting a single index result.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of tensor algebra, specifically tensor products and contractions.
  • Familiarity with Minkowski space and its metric, ## \eta_{\mu\nu} ##.
  • Knowledge of contravariant and covariant indices in tensor notation.
  • Basic grasp of rank definitions in tensors (e.g., rank two and rank three tensors).
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of tensor contractions in detail.
  • Learn about the implications of using different metrics in flat vs. curved spacetime.
  • Explore the application of tensor products in theoretical physics, particularly in general relativity.
  • Investigate common notational conventions in tensor calculus to avoid confusion.
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for physicists, mathematicians, and students engaged in theoretical physics, particularly those working with tensors in relativity and field theory.

Milsomonk
Messages
100
Reaction score
17
TL;DR
Basic Index gymnastics
Hi all, I'm pretty rusty on my index gymnastics, I'm wondering if someone can explain to me the correct way to take the tensor product of a general 4-vector ## g^{\mu} ## and a tensor ## P^{/mu\ /nu} ## in Minkowski space. The part that is troubling me is the fact that both have a ## \mu ## as a contravariant index. Many thanks in advance for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The tensor product would be a rank 3 tensor ##g^\sigma P^{\mu\nu}##. The names of the indices does not have any intrinsic meaning. If you want the tensor product, you simply should not call indices in the different tensors the same.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Milsomonk and vanhees71
As Orodruin says, the product of a vector and a rank two tensor is a rank three tensor, ##T^{\mu\nu\sigma}=g^\mu P^{\nu\sigma}##.

If you are expecting a single index in the output, you need to contract the vector with the tensor. First you need to lower an index, either the one on your vector or the one on the tensor you want to contract over, using the metric ##\eta_{\mu\nu}##. Then you can sum over the indices you intend to contract. So ##g_\mu=\eta_{\mu\nu}g^\nu##, then your final result (assuming you want to contract with the first index on ##P##) is ##v^\nu=g_\mu P^{\mu\nu}##.

Note that the metric in flat spacetime is denoted ##\eta_{\mu\nu}## by convention, but in curved spacetime ##g_{\mu\nu}## is usually used. You can't confuse the rank two metric tensor with a vector, but nonetheless ##g## is probably a bad choice of symbol.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Orodruin, Milsomonk and cianfa72
Thanks for your replies! I am just trying to follow the working in an old thesis. I am expecting a single index result in the form of a force so I think their use of the term tensor product was in fact a little misleading.
Thanks again, this has been very helpful!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
901
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
948
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K