Undergrad Index placement on 4-potential

  • Thread starter Thread starter dyn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Index Placement
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the interpretation of the 4-potential components in the context of a specific metric diag(1,-1,-1,-1). It clarifies that A1 does not equal -Ax, as A1 refers to the covariant component of the 4-vector while Ax is the x-component of the 3-vector. The equation E1/c = -∂x(V/c) - (1/c)∂tA1 is analyzed, revealing a sign change that arises from the relationships between covariant and contravariant components. The conversation emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between different types of vector components and their roles in electromagnetic theory. Ultimately, it reinforces that E and B are components of the antisymmetric electromagnetic tensor F, rather than traditional vectors.
dyn
Messages
774
Reaction score
63
Hi.
I am working through some notes which use the following metric diag(1,-1,-1,-1).
They give the 4-potential as ( Aμ ) = ( V/c , A ) where V is the scalar potential and A is the vector potential. This should mean in components A0 = V/c and A1 = A1 and so on but with the metric given shouldn't A1 = - A1 ?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Be careful not to confuse potential different meanings of ##A_1## and ##A_1##. When you write ##A_1##, do you mean the Cartesian components of the 3-vector ##\vec A## or the covariant components of the 4-vector ##A##?
 
When I wrote A1 I meant Ax ie. the x-component of the 3-vector A
 
dyn said:
When I wrote A1 I meant Ax ie. the x-component of the 3-vector A
Then no. It is not necessary that ##A^1 = - A_x## as ##A_x## is not the same as ##A_1##. The sign difference is between the covariant and contravariant spatial components of the 4-potential. As I said, do not confuse the components of a 3-vector with the covariant (or contravariant for that matter) components of a 4-vector. Typically, the generalisation of a 3-vector to a 4-vector will be such that the 3-vector components are the same as the covariant components of the 4-vector, but this may sometimes be subject to sign conventions and if the 3-vector is more naturally viewed as having covariant or contravariant components. In some cases, there is no 4-vector generalisation of the 3-vector at all, such as in the case of the electric and magnetic field where their components instead together constitute the components of the electromagnetic field tensor.
 
  • Like
Likes dyn
Thanks. I asked the question because I don't understand the following question. Using E = -∇V - ∂tA the x-component is given as E1/c = -∂x(V/c) -(1/c)∂tA1 = ∂1A0 - ∂0A1
Is this equation correct ? If so , I don't understand the sign change on the 1st term and it seems to me it uses A1 for Ax
 
dyn said:
Using E = -∇V - ∂tA the x-component is given as E1/c = -∂x(V/c) -(1/c)∂tA1 = ∂1A0 - ∂0A1

Say ##x^0=ct, V=A^0##,
E^1=-\frac{\partial V}{\partial x^1}-\frac{\partial A^1}{\partial x^0}
=-\frac{\partial A^0}{\partial x^1}-\frac{\partial A^1}{\partial x^0}
=-\frac{\partial A_0}{\partial x^1}+\frac{\partial A_1}{\partial x^0}
=\frac{\partial A_1}{\partial x^0}-\frac{\partial A_0}{\partial x^1}
=F_{10}=-F^{10}
where
F_{\mu\nu}=\frac{\partial A_\mu}{\partial x^\nu}-\frac{\partial A_\mu}{\partial x^\nu}

Similarly ##B^1=F_{23}=F^{23}##
Actually E and B are not vectors but components of antisymmetric electromagnetic tensor F.
 
  • Like
Likes dyn
In an inertial frame of reference (IFR), there are two fixed points, A and B, which share an entangled state $$ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0>_A|1>_B+|1>_A|0>_B) $$ At point A, a measurement is made. The state then collapses to $$ |a>_A|b>_B, \{a,b\}=\{0,1\} $$ We assume that A has the state ##|a>_A## and B has ##|b>_B## simultaneously, i.e., when their synchronized clocks both read time T However, in other inertial frames, due to the relativity of simultaneity, the moment when B has ##|b>_B##...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K