Indicate whether sech(x) is invertible for [0, infinity) and explain why

  • Thread starter Thread starter yoohoo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Explain Infinity
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the invertibility of the function sech(x) over the interval [0, infinity). Participants are exploring the conditions under which this function may or may not be one-to-one, which is a requirement for invertibility.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • One participant attempts to demonstrate invertibility by considering the derivative of sech(x) and its monotonicity. Another participant questions the one-to-one nature of the function by suggesting to evaluate specific values of sech(x). There is also a recognition of the importance of the specified interval [0, infinity) in the discussion.

Discussion Status

The discussion is actively exploring the properties of the sech function in relation to its invertibility. Some guidance has been offered regarding the need to establish whether the function is one-to-one, and participants are engaging with the implications of the specified interval.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the constraints of the problem, particularly the focus on the interval [0, infinity), which influences the relevance of certain evaluations and assumptions about the function's behavior.

yoohoo
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Indicate whether sech(x) is invertible for [0, infinity) and explain why.

The Attempt at a Solution



Sooo... I know that:

sech(x) = 2 / ( ex + e-x )​

I know that to get the inverse equation I'd need to swap the y and the x... but I'm trying to show whether it's invertible so I don't know how much that would do me. I think I need to prove that the equation is monotonic, ie the derivative should be > 0 ). Hence, I took the derivative of the equation to be:

y' = - 2 (ex - e-x) / (ex + e-x)2

Is that right? If so, is that enough to answer the question?

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You could show that sech(x) is not 1 to 1.

What are sech(1) and sech(-1) ?
 
But the problem said invertible on [0, infinity) so x= -1 is not relevant.
 
DUH !

Sorry, I missed the [0, infinity) !

It's right there in the title and in the text!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K