Moonbear
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
- 11,919
- 54
I have cited information that shows averages. I assume you understand the concept of averages, right? People actually DO study cat behavior, believe it or not.cyrusabdollahi said:And where did you get information that my cat is doing that? Did you follow my cat around at night to see if she was doing that? You are specuating here just as much as I am...![]()
Why is it not equivalent? If you do not have a large enough yard or the inclination to provide an adequate enclosure, then you shouldn't own that pet, just like someone who has anything less than 3 to 5 acres of property should not have a horse. If you can't provide a suitable environment for your cat on your property, then you have no business owning that cat. It's not up to your neighbors to provide that space unless they have chosen to share ownership of that cat with you.I am sitting in my chair STUNNED that you agree that confining an animal is good for its health...(And I don't want to hear your whole, "build it an ourdoor prison camp in your backyard" story again, that is NOT equivalent, and you know it)
Nah, uh uh.

And did you read the next sentence? The one that said:That is NOT consistent with what you said before! And I quote:
Moonbear said:Again, I've already provided several links that show how one should provide an appropriate indoor environment or outdoor enclosure for cats that meets all their behavioral needs.
All of the sites I have provided links to have cited that it is FACT that outdoor cats live shorter lives than indoor cats. Yes, that is an average; I thought being a science forum, that would be obvious. Not every outdoor cat gets hit by a car at age 3 and not every indoor cat lives to 20. And, why should your cat suffer the first time? You shouldn't have to make the cat learn your lessons for you. As I said before, you and your cat have been very lucky, fortunate. That doesn't make it any better of an idea.It really seems, or you know for a fact that it is? If you own a cat, and you let it outside, and it comes back all scrappy from a fight with ticks, then you should have enough sense to know better not to let that happen twice. But that is not true all the time and it is NOT true for all cases. So don't extrapolate that to be all inclusive, please!![]()
I've been consistent all along; the links I have been providing have been saying pretty much the same thing. But, without some form of enclosure or supervision, how do you keep your cat in your backyard and ensure it is not wandering into the neighbor's yard? And, yes, that "and" should have been "and/or" regarding supervision and/or an enclosure. That was a simple typo. I'm providing my opinion based on the evidence of experts. What are you basing your opinion on other than your luck with one cat?I am still trying to figure out what exactly it is you think? First you say she can't go outside. Then you say she can go only in the backyard as long as she's not on others property. Then you say she can't go outside even if she is on private property!
Are you just making things up as you go??
I haven't read that article yet, but I'm puzzled a bit by the comparison of sick outdoor cats to healthy indoor ones, so am going to have to look further tomorrow...I can't get electronic access to that journal to work from home tonight. I'm wondering if it's just that there weren't enough sick indoor-only cats brought in, or if it's that there weren't enough healthy outdoor cats with the infection (they may be coming in because of the infection symptoms rather than detecting it while still appearing healthy).: J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2006 Feb 1;228(3):371-6.Seroprevalence of feline leukemia virus and feline immunodeficiency virus infection among cats in North America and risk factors for seropositivity.
Levy JK, Scott HM, Lachtara JL, Crawford PC.
Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610-0126, USA.
OBJECTIVE: To determine seroprevalence of FeLV and FIV infection among cats in North America and risk factors for seropositivity. DESIGN: Prospective cross-sectional survey. ANIMALS: 18,038 cats tested at 345 veterinary clinics (n=9,970) and 145 animal shelters (8,068) between August and November 2004. PROCEDURE: Cats were tested with a point-of-care ELISA for FeLV antigen and FIV antibody. A multivariable random effects logistic regression model was used to identify risk factors significantly associated with seropositivity while accounting for clinic-to-clinic (or shelter) variability. RESULTS: 409 (2.3%) cats were seropositive for FeLV antigen, and 446 (2.5%) cats were seropositive for FIV antibody; 58 (0.3%) cats were seropositive for infection with both viruses. Multivariable analysis indicated that age, sex, health status, and cat lifestyle and source were significantly associated with risk of seropositivity, with adults more likely to be seropositive than juveniles (adjusted odds ratios [ORs], 2.5 and 2.05 for FeLV and FIV seropositivity, respectively), sexually intact adult males more likely to be seropositive than sexually intact adult females (adjusted ORs, 2.4 and 4.66), and outdoor cats that were sick at the time of testing more likely to be seropositive than healthy indoor cats (adjusted ORs, 8.89 and 11.3). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Results suggest that certain characteristics, such as age, sex, health status, and lifestyle, are associated with risk of FeLV and FIV seropositivity among cats in North America. However, cats in all categories were found to be at risk for infection, and current guidelines to test all cats at the time of acquisition and again during illness should be followed. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/..._uids=16448357&query_hl=2&itool=pubmed_docsum
J Small Anim Pract. 2006 Feb;47(2):89-93.
Y-T humeral fractures with supracondylar comminution in five cats.
Macias C, Gibbons SE, McKee WM.
Centro Veterinario De Referencia Bahia de Malaga, Parque Empresarial Laurotorre 25, Alhaurin de la Torre, 29130 Malaga, Spain.
Five cats with Y-T fractures of the humeral condyle were reviewed. Breeds presented included domestic shorthair (four cats) and Maine Coon (one cat). Age ranged from two to 16 years. All the cats were neutered males. A road traffic accident was suspected in all cases. Four of the fractures were severely comminuted and one fracture had four fragments. The fractures were repaired via combined medial and lateral approaches. Fixation of the epicondylar ridges was performed using buttress plates in four cases and neutralisation plates in one case. The intracondylar fracture was stabilised using a 2.7 mm lag screw in four cases and a 3.5 mm lag screw in the other. A corticocancellous bone graft was applied in two cases. The intracondylar fracture was accurately reduced in all cases. Complete radiographic healing was documented in two cases 6 and 11 weeks following surgery. Failure of the fixation occurred in the most severely comminuted fracture five days postoperatively. Surgical revision was not performed, and the limb was amputated. Three cats were free of lameness and had resumed outdoor activities at follow-up (five to eight months after surgery). Marked lameness due to loss of elbow movement was observed in the other case.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/..._uids=16438696&query_hl=2&itool=pubmed_docsum
Biologicals. 2005 Dec;33(4):219-20. Epub 2005 Oct 28.Feline immunodeficiency virus vaccine: a rational paradigm for clinical decision-making.
Zislin A.
Fort Dodge Animal Health, 9225 Indian Creek Parkway, Suite 400, Overland Park, KS 66210, USA. azislin@fdah.com
A veterinarian must take into consideration his/her responsibility to prevent disease when assessing the needs of a client's cat that is risk for FIV infection based on its established lifestyle. Cats infected with FIV have debilitated immune functions and exhibit a high level of chronic morbidity impacting on the animal's welfare and the owner's economic abilities to maintain the pet. Attempts to reduce the prevalence of FIV solely by advising clients to maintain their cats indoors has resulted in poor compliance and not impacted on a change in infection rates with outdoor cats. Therapeutics have not impacted on outcomes in infected animals. There has a need for a vaccine for high-risk cats. Options for vaccines that do not confound the current FIV antibody test have not been efficacious against a broad spectrum of isolates. Fel-O-Vax FIV, a conventional non-marker whole virus, has shown good efficacy against heterologous challenges. The intervention should be discussed with cat owners since the vaccine has a reasonable expectation of preventing FIV infection in cats at risk without undue safety issues. Veterinarians who do not initiate this dialogue with owners who have outdoor cats in an environment where 2.5% of cats in the USA are infected may be remiss in their professional responsibilities. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/..._uids=16257537&query_hl=2&itool=pubmed_docsum
J Parasitol. 1995 Oct;81(5):736-41.
Risk factors for transmission of Toxoplasma gondii on swine farms in Illinois.
Weigel RM, Dubey JP, Siegel AM, Kitron UD, Mannelli A, Mitchell MA, Mateus-Pinilla NE, Thulliez P, Shen SK, Kwok OC, et al.
Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801, USA.
Two epidemiologic studies of risk factors for transmission of Toxoplasma gondii to swine were conducted for farms in Illinois. The first study was a cross-sectional survey of swine farms from the state of Illinois pseudorabies testing program, in which farm owners or managers were interviewed by telephone regarding presence of risk factors for transmission of T. gondii on the farm. There were 123 farms surveyed that provided blood samples for at least 30 sows. The mean sow seroprevalence was 19.5% (median = 10.0%). Multiple regression analysis of the association of sow seroprevalence with outdoor housing of sows, cat access to sow areas, number of sows, open feed storage and water delivery, delayed removal of carcasses, and presence of rodents on the farm indicated that higher sow seroprevalence was associated with cat access to sows (P = 0.009) and fewer sows in the herd (P = 0.05). The second study was a field investigation of 47 swine farms (37 from the cross-sectional study). Data collection included obtaining blood samples from swine, cats, and rodents, and fecal samples from cats, heart and brain tissue from rodents, and feed, water, and soil samples for T. gondii examination. The risk of T. gondii transmission from cats and rodents to sows and finishing pigs was evaluated, taking into account housing conditions and herd size. Multiple regression analysis indicated that T. gondii seroprevalence in finishing pigs increased with more seropositive juvenile cats on the farm (P < 0.0001) and higher seroprevalence in house mice (P = 0.0023).
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/...t_uids=7472865&query_hl=2&itool=pubmed_DocSum
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1990 Jan 1;196(1):96-9.Risk factors for Haemobartonella felis infection in cats.
Grindem CB, Corbett WT, Tomkins MT.
Department of Microbiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27606.
A seroepidemiologic survey for Haemobartonella felis infection in cats of Wake County, NC was undertaken. To help assess risk factors, cat owners completed a 10-item questionnaire. Additionally, blood samples were obtained for determination of H felis presence, FeLV infection, and anemia. Prevalence rates for H felis presence were as follows: all cats, 4.9% (6/123); healthy cats, 3.6% (3/83); and ill cats, 7.5% (3/40). The estimated relative risk for haemobartonellosis was also increased in cats with any of the following: anemia, FeLV-positive status, lack of vaccinations, history of catbite abscesses and/or anemia, age less than or equal to 3 years, or outdoor-roaming status. The sex, breed, number of cats in the household, or presence of fleas were not significant factors, although ill male cats had a greater estimated relative risk for haemobartonellosis.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/...t_uids=2295559&query_hl=2&itool=pubmed_DocSum