Induced E Field? B Field, Current, Electron

  • Thread starter Thread starter cragar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field Induced
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the interaction between a magnetic field (B field) and an electron in the context of relative motion. When approaching a B field with current-carrying sheets, the observer questions whether the electron's movement is due to an induced electric field (E field) or the magnetic force acting on it. The conversation highlights that the observer perceives the B field moving towards them, while the electron appears at rest, complicating the interpretation of forces. It is noted that Lorentz contraction affects the perceived charge density, leading to the generation of an E field in the observer's frame. Ultimately, the relationship between electric and magnetic forces in this scenario is complex and not straightforward.
cragar
Messages
2,546
Reaction score
3
If I have a B field in between two current carrying sheets and I approach this moving at a constant speed. And I have an electron in my hand, when I see the electron move will I say it moved because of an induced E field? Or If I am standing by the plates and I see the electron move into the B field, I will say that it moved because of the magnetic force. So does my movement induce an E field?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think the electron will be affected by an electric field that it itself produces. There is an electric field around the electron, though it is because of the fact it is charged, not because there is movement.
 
Im talking about the movement of the B field towards me . In my frame the electron is at rest and the B field in between the plates is moving towards me, but when I get into the B field I will see the electron move. From my frame is the process electric or magnetic
 
So instead of the electron moving between the plates, you are suggesting that the plates are moving towards the electron? If that is the case, then one can also consider the electron moving towards stationary plates, in which case the B field is the one that is imposing a force on the electron (F = qvB).
 
well I don't think its that simple . If the current carrying sheets are moving towards me I will see a lorentz contraction and then i will get a net charge and an E field in my frame. Because The electrons moving in the sheet current are now approchaing me at a greater speed than the protons in the material.
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top