Induced EMF and a circular loop of wire

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
8 replies · 3K views
anonymousphys
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 25-turn circular loop of wire has a diameter of 1m. In 0.2 seconds it is flipped 180 degrees at a location where the magnitude of the Earth's magnetic field is 50 micro T. What is the emf generated in the loop?

Homework Equations


-(dB/dt)(A)=V

The Attempt at a Solution


When I use NABwsin(wt)=V, I get zero. When I use -(dB/dt)(A)=V, I get a non-zero number. I believe the 2nd equation works but why doesn't the first work?

Thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
anonymousphys said:

Homework Statement


A 25-turn circular loop of wire has a diameter of 1m. In 0.2 seconds it is flipped 180 degrees at a location where the magnitude of the Earth's magnetic field is 50 micro T. What is the emf generated in the loop?


Homework Equations


-(dB/dt)(A)=V


The Attempt at a Solution


When I use NABwsin(wt)=V, I get zero. When I use -(dB/dt)(A)=V, I get a non-zero number. I believe the 2nd equation works but why doesn't the first work?

Thanks for any help.

Where does the first equation come from? If you used d/dt[BA] = V is B changing?
 
Thanks for the reply. NABwsin(wt)=V comes from taking the derivative of NABcos(wt)=magnetic flux. The 2nd equation should be taking into account the change in angle. Shouldn't both equations lead to the same answer?
 
anonymousphys said:
Thanks for the reply. NABwsin(wt)=V comes from taking the derivative of NABcos(wt)=magnetic flux. The 2nd equation should be taking into account the change in angle. Shouldn't both equations lead to the same answer?

I believe they should. How did you get 0 for the first equation? I do not get 0.
 
Show the work on both because when I use the 2nd equation all that happens is I derive the first equation.
 
zachzach said:
I believe they should. How did you get 0 for the first equation? I do not get 0.

w=pi/(.2)
sin(wt) when t=(.2) equals 0.

Hm..I think I'm not using the equation correctly?
 
Doh! I see what you mean :/.
 
Here's my thoughts: By plugging in wt only for the final time, you only are calculating the emf produced at that instant. So maybe you should use:

V = -d/dt(BA) = -[BA(Final) - BA(Initial)]/[t(Final) - t(Initial)]

sorry cannot get fraction in latex to work, I am a newb.
 
Last edited:
[tex] <br /> V = -\frac{d}{dt}[BA] = -[\frac{BA_f - BA_i}{t_f - t_i}]<br /> [/tex]

I did it in latex :).