Inductance: given V waveform, find I

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the current through a 3 mH inductor given a specific voltage waveform over time. The voltage is 15 V from 0 to 2 ms, 0 V from 2 to 4 ms, and -30 V from 4 to 6 ms. The calculated currents at specific times are 5 A at 1 ms, 10 A at 4 ms, and 0 A at 5 ms. The integral relationship between voltage and current is emphasized, with the integration constant determined by the initial current condition.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of inductance and its role in electrical circuits
  • Familiarity with the relationship between voltage and current in inductors
  • Knowledge of calculus, specifically integration
  • Ability to analyze piecewise functions and their implications in circuit analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the inductor voltage-current relationship using the formula u(t)=L(di(t)/dt)
  • Learn about piecewise functions in electrical engineering contexts
  • Explore the concept of initial conditions in differential equations
  • Investigate the effects of different voltage waveforms on inductor behavior
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit designers, and anyone studying electromagnetic theory who seeks to deepen their understanding of inductive circuits and current calculations.

courteous
Messages
37
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An inductance of 3 mH has the following voltage waveform: for 0<t<2\text{ }ms, v=15\text{ }V; for 2ms<t<4ms, v=0; and for 4\text{ }ms<t<6\text{ }ms, v=-30\text{ }V. Assuming i(0)=0, find the current at time (a) 1 ms, (b) 4 ms, (c) 5 ms.

Ans. (a) 5 A; (b) 10 A; (c) 0

Homework Equations


u(t)=L\frac{di(t)}{dt} \Rightarrow i(t)=\frac{1}{L}\int v(t)dt

The Attempt at a Solution


Even for (a) case (for which I somehow get the "correct" solution :approve:), I'm not sure about the physical background: how do I use integral in i(t) equation if I have to find currents at particular instances for t = {1, 4 and 5}?!

[PLAIN]http://img848.imageshack.us/img848/9894/dsc00990k.jpg

(a) i(t=1)=\frac{15}{L}\int dt=5t=5\text{ }A

(b) What is v(t=4) ... 0 V or -30 V?

(c) As in (a) case, i(t=5)=\frac{-30}{L}\int dt=-10t=-50\text{ }A \neq 0\text{ }A
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
As the voltage is constant between those two intervals, (t=0, t=2), your integral will give you i(t)=\frac{1}{L}Vt + C.

Here the constant is the value of the current at time t=0. It is given that i(0)=C=0.

As L=3mH, V=15v and t=1ms, substituting these values you get your answer.

Second part or your answer requires the current at t=4ms.

Before we get to t=4, what was the state at t=2?

Using the above realation, the current at t=2ms was 10A. This was your initial current, and thus C=10A in this case (I'm referring to the integration constant).

Using the same equation, as V=0, i(t=2,t=4)=C=10 A (it is constant between t=2ms and t=4ms).

Similarly, can you work out the last part?
 
So the last part can be isolated? So that the initial current at t=4 is 10 A ... and t=4 can be thought of as t=0? Then t=5 is equivalent to t=1:
i(t=5)=\frac{1}{3}(-30)(1)+10=0\text{ }A

I also found it easier to reverse i(t) into v(t) and look at derivatives of current.

[PLAIN]http://img683.imageshack.us/img683/341/dsc00991ep.jpg

Thank you! I really got some intuition behind it (if ever so slightly).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
courteous said:
So the last part can be isolated? So that the initial current at t=4 is 10 A ... and t=4 can be thought of as t=0? Then t=5 is equivalent to t=1:
i(t=5)=\frac{1}{3}(-30)(1)+10=0\text{ }A

No! What that means is that if we started analyzing the circuit at t=4, the value of current that we would have to deal with is 10A. So, the 'initial condition' at t=4 is i(t=4)=10A

Mathematically, the substitution that you've used will work. What it really means is that at t=5, the voltage waveform has been applied for 1 second. In that sense you could say that t=5 implies that the voltage has been applied for t=1 seconds.

I also found it easier to reverse i(t) into v(t) and look at derivatives of current.
.

It's the same principle that you have to apply in either case. Use whatever you find easier to apply, but understand both.
 

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
64K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K