Induction: 1+2+2^2+2^3+ +2^n-1=2^n-1

  • Thread starter Thread starter Daaniyaal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on using mathematical induction to prove the formula 1 + 2 + 2^2 + ... + 2^(n-1) = 2^n - 1 for integers n ≥ 1. The initial base case for n=1 is confirmed as true. However, confusion arises in the inductive step, particularly in the transition from k to k+1, where incorrect notation leads to a misunderstanding of the equation. Clarifications emphasize the need to correctly express the terms and ensure the left and right sides of the equation match appropriately. The discussion concludes with the realization that combining terms correctly resolves the confusion.
Daaniyaal
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement [/b]
Use mathematical induction to prove the following statements are true for all integers n≥1
1+2+2^2+2^3+...+2^n-1=2^n-1



Attempt at a solution:


For n=1

1+2^(1-1)=2^1-1
1=1
∴ it is true.


Let Sn=Sk
If it is true for k, it must also be true for k+1

1+2+2^2+2^3+...+2^k+2^k+1-1=(2^k+1)-1

This is the part I have a slight confusion at, I keep getting something left over and the sides don't equal each other :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Daaniyaal said:
1. Homework Statement [/b]
Use mathematical induction to prove the following statements are true for all integers n≥1
1+2+2^2+2^3+...+2^n-1=2^n-1



Attempt at a solution:


For n=1

1+2^(1-1)=2^1-1
1=1
∴ it is true.


Let Sn=Sk
If it is true for k, it must also be true for k+1

1+2+2^2+2^3+...+2^k+2^k+1-1=(2^k+1)-1

This is the part I have a slight confusion at, I keep getting something left over and the sides don't equal each other :(

Use brackets: you have written
1+2+2^2+2^3+...+2^n-1=2^n-1 , which is plainly impossible, because it would require that we have 1+2+2^2+2^3+... = 0 (in order to have 2^n-1=2^n-1 on both sides). If you mean 2^(n-1), then that is what you need to say.

RGV
 
You want to prove that if, for some k, 2^0+ 2^1+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ 2^{k-1}= 2^k-1 then 2^0+ 2^1+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ 2^{k-1}+ 2^k= 2^{k+1}-1.
(What you wrote, 1+ 2^1+ ...+ 2^n-1= 2^n-1 is, as Ray Vickson said, clearly impossible because you have "2^n- 1" on both sides but with additional positive terms on the left. Of course, you meant 2^(n-1) on the left and (2^n)- 1 on the right. Those are very different and you can't ask people to guess what you mean.)

To go from k to k+1, obviously you are adding 2^k to the sum on the left so do it on the right:
2^0+ 2^1+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ 2^{k-1}+ 2^k= (2^k- 1)+ 2^k

What do you get when you combine those two "2^k" terms on the right?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I figured it out, thanks!
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top