How Does Increasing Core Permeability Affect an RL Circuit's Performance?

AI Thread Summary
Increasing the core permeability in an RL circuit affects the magnetic fields and energy dynamics without changing the steady-state current or voltage. When a core with higher permeability is inserted, it results in a stronger magnetic field (B-field), which increases the magnetic energy in the circuit. This change necessitates additional energy from the power supply to compensate for the increased magnetic energy, as the energy loss must be accounted for. The relationship between the H-field and B-field remains consistent, but the overall magnetic energy calculations become complex due to altered field shapes. Ultimately, the core substitution leads to a need for greater power supply output to maintain circuit performance.
cnh1995
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
3,487
Reaction score
1,165
In an RC dc circuit at steady state, if the permitivitty of the capacitor is increased by inserting a different dielectric, additional charging current will flow and the capacitor will accept more charge (due to increase in capacitance). What will happen if the inductance in an RL circuit is increased similarly (at the steady state),i.e. by increasing the permeability of the core? Here, the final value of the current is same for both the cores.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cnh1995 said:
What will happen if the inductance in an RL circuit is increased similarly (at the steady state),i.e. by increasing the permeability of the core?
Say you have some solenoid ( cylindric core ) with some relative permeability, μr = 100. You pull it out from within the coil, and are using some force to do so ( F100 ).
Now you substitute it with another core ( μr = 1000 ), and putting in the core, the new core will be attracted by a force, F1000.
F1000 ≈ 10 * F100 , so all in all the result is lost energy as seen from the circuit, and that lost energy must be compensated somehow by the powersupply ( yielding more amps or volts integrated over time of replacement ).

From another point of view, you can say that switching the cores has caused:
- the steady state current is the same.
- the voltage across the RL circuit is the same.
- the H-field ( proportional to current ) is the same.
- the B-field has increased ( B = μ0 * μr * H )

As the magnetic energy tends to be proportional to B*H, the powersupply must also deliver this growth in magnetic energy, but this a hard calculation because the steady state shape of the magnetic fields will be altered by substitution of the core. The calculations of growth in magnetic energy depends on the exact dimensions of the magnetic circuit.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
45
Views
19K
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
32
Views
8K
Back
Top