Inelastic Collision: Cart of Mass m Hits Stationary Cart of Mass 2m

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

An inelastic collision occurs when a cart of mass m moving at velocity v collides with a stationary cart of mass 2m, resulting in both carts sticking together post-collision. The conservation of momentum dictates that (m)(v) = (3m)(vf), leading to the final velocity (vf) being v/3. The mass m cancels out during calculations, confirming that the final velocity does not depend on mass, ensuring unit consistency in the result.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of inelastic collisions
  • Familiarity with momentum conservation principles
  • Basic algebra for solving equations
  • Knowledge of unit analysis in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of conservation of momentum in different types of collisions
  • Learn about the differences between elastic and inelastic collisions
  • Explore unit analysis techniques in physics problems
  • Practice solving problems involving multiple objects in collisions
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding collision dynamics and momentum conservation.

Lo.Lee.Ta.
Messages
217
Reaction score
0
"A cart of mass m moving at velocity v to the right collides with a stationary cart"

1. "A cart of mass m moving at velocity v to the right collides with a stationary cart of mass 2m on an air track, and the two stick together after collision.
What is their velocity after colliding?"

2. Okay, so this is inelastic collision, right? So KEi ≠KEf
But momentum is conserved.

So:

(m1)(v1i) + (m2)(v2i) = (m1 + m2)(final velocity)

(m)(v) + (2m)(0) = (m + 2m)(final velocity)
(m)(v) = (3m)(vf)
mv/3m = vf

...So wouldn't the 1 of the m's cancel out here, creating v/2m?

3. The answer is really v/3... Somehow. How is this?
How does the answer not even have an m?
How do you get this answer? :confused:

Thank you! :D
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Lo.Lee.Ta. said:
mv/3m = vf

...So wouldn't the 1 of the m's cancel out here, creating v/2m?
No. The m on top cancels the m on the bottom, leaving v/3 = vf.

If m were part of the result then unit analysis would not be consistent: v/2m => m/(s*kg) ≠ m/s
 
Last edited:


Oh, wow, Lewando! Thanks! :D

I get into problems when I make math errors! Sometimes I forget fundamental things like that...:frown:

But thank you SO much!
You're awesome! :D
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K