Inelastic Collisions: Kinetic Energy Loss Explained

AI Thread Summary
Kinetic energy is lost in inelastic collisions due to the very definition of inelasticity, which involves deformation and energy dissipation. In contrast, elastic collisions conserve kinetic energy, allowing the objects to rebound without permanent deformation. The energy that is lost during an inelastic collision typically transforms into heat energy within the colliding bodies. Understanding the distinction between elastic and inelastic collisions is crucial for grasping the principles of energy conservation in physics. This discussion highlights the fundamental differences in energy behavior during these types of collisions.
A-Train
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Why is Kinetic Energy lost in an inelastic collision but not in an elastic collision?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Uhh, because that's the definition of "inelastic" collision?

If you are looking for more- like what makes on collision elastic and another inelastic, please rephrase the question.

(If you wondering what happens to the energy, typically it becomes heat energy in the colliding bodies.
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
View full post »

Similar threads

Elastic or inelastic collision?
Replies
8
Views
2K
How Do Inelastic Collisions Distribute Energy Between Heat and Sound?
Replies
1
Views
1K
B K Energy & Momentum: Driving Force or Lost Heat?
Replies
12
Views
1K
How momentum is conserved in an inelastic collision
Replies
25
Views
4K
Why is momentum conserved in elastic and inelastic collisions?
Replies
3
Views
2K
An Alternative Approach to Solving Collision Problems
Replies
7
Views
5K
Collisions Toolkit: Impulse, Momentum & Energy Formulas
Replies
1
Views
2K
Energy Lost During Purely Inelastic Collisions
Replies
6
Views
2K
Elastic and inelastic collisions
Replies
10
Views
4K
Counter-intuitive 2D collision
Replies
9
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top