Inequalities. Special relativity.

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of Lorentz transformations in special relativity, particularly focusing on the time and space separation between events in different reference frames. Participants explore the conditions under which causality is preserved and the nature of spacelike and timelike separations, as well as the interpretation of specific scenarios involving light signals and their reception in different frames.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the Lorentz transformation equations and questions whether it is possible for an event that is causally linked to occur before its cause in another reference frame.
  • Another participant asserts that causality is invariant across frames, stating that the order of cause and effect cannot change, only the apparent time between them.
  • Some participants clarify that only spacelike separated events can have their order changed, as they do not lie within each other's light cones.
  • It is noted that if two events are causally connected, the inequality relating their spacetime separation must hold, indicating that the speed of light is not exceeded.
  • A participant introduces a scenario involving an observer receiving light signals from two sources and questions how the order of reception might change in a moving frame.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between the emission and reception of light pulses when discussing their order in different frames.
  • One participant provides numerical examples to illustrate the calculations of spacetime intervals and raises questions about the implications of negative spacetime separations.
  • Concerns are raised about the interpretation of negative values in the context of spacetime separation and how they relate to the positions of events in different frames.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the principles of causality and the invariance of spacetime intervals, but there are multiple competing views regarding the interpretation of specific scenarios and the implications of spacelike and timelike separations. The discussion remains unresolved on certain aspects, particularly regarding the understanding of negative spacetime separations.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the sign convention used for spacetime intervals may vary, leading to different interpretations of whether events are timelike or spacelike separated. Additionally, there are unresolved questions about the assumptions made in specific numerical examples and their implications for the understanding of causality in different frames.

LagrangeEuler
Messages
711
Reaction score
22
Lorentz transformation. Time separation between two events in system S and system S' is given by Lorentz transformations

[tex]\Delta t'=\frac{\Delta t-\frac{u \Delta x}{c^2}}{\sqrt{1-\frac{u^2}{c^2}}}[/tex]
If event 2 is caused by event 1 in system S then ##\Delta t=t_2-t_1##. But it is possible to choose ##\Delta x## in such way that ##\Delta t'## is negative. Which is very hard to understand. ##\Delta t'<0## only when ##\frac{u \Delta x}{c^2}>\Delta t## or

[tex]\frac{u}{c}>\frac{c\Delta t}{\Delta x}[/tex]
Now I am confused. ## \Delta x## is space separation between event 1 and event 2 and ##\Delta t## is time separation between events. Is it possible to choose some reference system S' in such way that event 2 occurs before event 1, even in case when event 2 is consequence of event 1?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Causality is not frame dependent, so no you can't pick a different frame that changes the order of cause/effect, you can only change the apparent time between cause and effect.
 
To add to what phinds said: It is possible to change the order only of spacelike separated events. Such events are not within each other's light cones and can therefore never have a causal relationship (either cannot affect the other). Such causes would propagate at speeds larger than the speed of light.
 
If event 2 is caused by event 1 then[tex] \frac{|\Delta x|} {|\Delta t|} < c[/tex]
 
You can see it in your original inequality: $$\frac{u}{c}>\frac{c\Delta t}{\Delta x}$$

Rearrange this inequality and you will get ##u\frac{\Delta x}{\Delta t} > c^2##. So you need either ##u>c## or ##\frac{\Delta x}{\Delta t}>c##. In the former case, you are making an invalid Lorentz transformation since you are transforming to a frame moving faster than the speed of light, and in the latter case the two events can not be causally connected since they are space-like separated.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PWiz
Thank you all for answers.

What is now problematic for me. For example observer sits on x-axis of reference frame S. He see red light at the distance of ##1210m## and for example ##4.96 \mu s## later blue light at the distance ##510m##. If I do not have information that two events are in some corelation how could I know that maybe in some reference frame S' with velocity ##u\vec{e}_x## relative to S some observer can/cannot register blue light before red light and is it or not that forbiden to observer in S'?
 
If two events are spacelike separated in one frame, they will be spacelike-separated in all frames. You can get to this conclusion by doing some algebra with the Lorentz transformations while respecting the constraint that the relative speed between any two frames must be less than ##c##.

Similar algebraic crunching will show that if two events are timelike-separated, the constraint that the relative speed between any two frames must be less that ##c## implies that the ordering of the events will be the same in all frames.
 
You need to be a little careful with "see" in this context. Do you mean that the observer receives a pulse of light from the red source at time zero, and a pulse of light from the blue source at time 4.96μs, or do you mean that the red source emits a pulse at time zero and the blue source emits a pulse at time 4.96μs? The former is what one would typically mean by "see", but the latter is what the Lorentz transforms will help you to relate[1].

I will assume that you mean that a red source at x=1210m emits a pulse that is received by an observer at x=0 at time t=0, and a blue source at x=510m emits a pulse that is received by the same observer at time t=4.96μs. We can calculate backwards and determine that the red pulse was emitted at time t=0-1210/c=-4.0μs and the blue pulse at time t=4.96μs-510/c=3.3μs. That is to say, the emission events were at (t1,x1)=(-4×10-6,1210) and (t2,x2)=(3.3×10-6,510), according to observers at rest in frame S. For observers at rest in any other frame, you would need to apply the Lorentz transforms to get the coordinates that they would record. However, whatever frame you are in, you will find that the interval, Δs2:
[tex]\Delta s^2=(c\Delta t)^2-(\Delta x^2+\Delta y^2+\Delta z^2)[/tex]
is always the same ("invariant"). The sign of that quantity will tell you whether the events are time-like separated (in which case everyone will agree on their time ordering but not necessarily their space ordering) or space-like separated (in which case everyone will agree on their space ordering, but not necessarily their time ordering). WARNING: There is no agreement about the sign convention in Δs2. Some people define it as I did; some people define it with the opposite sign. In the convention I have used, positive would mean time-like separated, and the two events could be causally linked. Negative would mean space-like separated, and the two events could not be causally linked. Zero would mean null separated, and the events could only be causally connected by light rays.

[1] That is a simplification - the Lorentz transforms applied to the time you receive the light pulses will tell you the times and places that moving observers record you as receiving the pulses. Since you are probably interested in the emission events, however, this isn't terribly interesting.
 
I can not understand this without a numbers. Let's try to add some numbers. My questions is given by bold letters. Let system S' is moving along x-axis with velocity ##u=0.8c##.
In system S we have two events, event 1 ##(x_1,t_1)## and event 2 ##(x_2,t_2)##, such as ##\Delta x=3\cdot 10^8## and ##\Delta t=5s##.

Then ##\Delta x'=\frac{\Delta x-u\Delta t}{\sqrt{1-\frac{u^2}{c^2}}}=-15\cdot 10^{8}m##. Could you explain me this minus? Does that means that event 2 is closer to man which sits in S'?

And ##\Delta t'=\frac{\Delta t-\frac{u \Delta x}{c^2}}{\sqrt{1-\frac{u^2}{c^2}}}=7s##

So now I want to calculate ##\Delta s^2## in both systems.
##(c\Delta t)^2-(\Delta x)^2=225\cdot 10^{16}-9\cdot 10^{16}=216\cdot 10^{16}m^2##
## (c\Delta t')^2-(\Delta x')^2=441\cdot 10^{16}-225 \cdot 10^{16}=216 \cdot 10^{16}m^2##
So it is really a scalar. If I understand you well if I have two events and I want to get space like separation ##\Delta x## needs to be huge. In that case even light can not get from one part of space to the other and because of that event 1 and 2 are not in any corelation. Right?
 
  • #10
LagrangeEuler said:
I can not understand this without a numbers. Let's try to add some numbers. My questions is given by bold letters. Let system S' is moving along x-axis with velocity ##u=0.8c##.
In system S we have two events, event 1 ##(x_1,t_1)## and event 2 ##(x_2,t_2)##, such as ##\Delta x=3\cdot 10^8## and ##\Delta t=5s##.

Then ##\Delta x'=\frac{\Delta x-u\Delta t}{\sqrt{1-\frac{u^2}{c^2}}}=-15\cdot 10^{8}m##. Could you explain me this minus? Does that means that event 2 is closer to man which sits in S'?
It's important to remember (and easy to lose sight of) the fact that observers at rest in one frame are moving in the other. In the frame S, your events are one light second apart in the x direction and 5s apart in the time direction. An observer at rest in S' (doing 0.8c in S) travels 4 light seconds in those 5s. If he is right beside the first event, he will be 3 light seconds past the second event when it happens. If you repeat the calculation with your frame S' moving at less than c/5 then you will find that Δx' is positive because the observer a rest in S' won't cross the light second gap in the five seconds he has.

You might find it easier to visualise with Δx=0. Imagine I am standing on the platform while you pass by in a train. At the instant you pass me, I let off a firework. Five seconds later I set off another. According to me (at rest in S) both fireworks went off in the same place (Δx=0). According to you (at rest in S') the first one went off right beside you (##x'_1=0##), but the second one went off somewhere behind you(##x'_2<0##). That gives you a negative Δx'.

LagrangeEuler said:
And ##\Delta t'=\frac{\Delta t-\frac{u \Delta x}{c^2}}{\sqrt{1-\frac{u^2}{c^2}}}=7s##

So now I want to calculate ##\Delta s^2## in both systems.
##(c\Delta t)^2-(\Delta x)^2=225\cdot 10^{16}-9\cdot 10^{16}=216\cdot 10^{16}m^2##
## (c\Delta t')^2-(\Delta x')^2=441\cdot 10^{16}-225 \cdot 10^{16}=216 \cdot 10^{16}m^2##
So it is really a scalar.
Strictly speaking you haven't proved that yet. Formally, you need to write ##(c\Delta t')^2-(\Delta x')^2## and use the Lorentz transforms to show that ##(c\Delta t')^2-(\Delta x')^2=(c\Delta t)^2-(\Delta x)^2## for any (x,t).

LagrangeEuler said:
If I understand you well if I have two events and I want to get space like separation ##\Delta x## needs to be huge. In that case even light can not get from one part of space to the other and because of that event 1 and 2 are not in any corelation. Right?
The condition is that ##\Delta x>c\Delta t##. So either you need a very large x difference or a very small time difference. For example, two events one meter apart (in some frame) are space-like separated as long as the time difference (in the same frame) does not exceed 3.33ns.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 123 ·
5
Replies
123
Views
8K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K