Inertia block on inclined surface problem? help with solution?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a wheel mounted on a frictionless axis, connected to a block sliding down an inclined surface. The block's acceleration and the relationship between linear and angular quantities are central to the discussion.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between linear and angular acceleration, questioning the manipulation of terms in equations related to the rotational inertia of the wheel.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively questioning specific steps in the derivation, particularly regarding the treatment of variables and the transition from one form of the equation to another. Some guidance has been offered, but multiple interpretations of the equations are being discussed.

Contextual Notes

There is a reference to a specific solution document, which may contain additional context or steps that are not fully detailed in the thread. The problem setup includes assumptions about frictionless surfaces and the behavior of the cord and pulley system.

nchin
Messages
172
Reaction score
0
A wheel of radius 0.20 m is mounted on a frictionless horizontal axis. A massless cord wrapped around the wheel is attaches to a 2.0 kg block that slides on a horizontal frictionless surface inclined at angle θ = 20 degrees with the horizontal. The box accelerates down the surface at 2.0 m/s^(2). What is the rotational inertia of the wheel about the axle?

Solution and picture is on page 32-33
http://mrlee.dreamstation.com/apPhysics/lect/apPhysics_lec_10.pdf

I understand all the steps except the last one where

m1(gsinθ - a1)r2 / a1 / r2 = m1(gsinθ - a1)r2^(2) / a1

why did they divide the denominator a1 by r2? and how did the r2 in the numerator become r2^(2)??


thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Note that linear acceleration of the string wound round the pulley is the same as a[itex]_{1}[/itex] since the string is assumed that does not extend.

Now linear velocity = radius x angular velocity.

Similarly linear acceleration = radius x angular acceleration.

i.e. a[itex]_{2}[/itex] = r[itex]_{2}[/itex]α[itex]_{2}[/itex]

but a[itex]_{2}[/itex] = a[itex]_{1}[/itex]

therefore a[itex]_{1}[/itex] = r[itex]_{2}[/itex]α[itex]_{2}[/itex]

i.e. α[itex]_{2}[/itex] = [itex]\frac{a_{1}}{r_{2}}[/itex]
 
nchin said:
and how did the r2 in the numerator become r2^(2)??
1/(1/x) = x

x/(1/x) = x^2
 
grzz said:
Note that linear acceleration of the string wound round the pulley is the same as a[itex]_{1}[/itex] since the string is assumed that does not extend.

Now linear velocity = radius x angular velocity.

Similarly linear acceleration = radius x angular acceleration.

i.e. a[itex]_{2}[/itex] = r[itex]_{2}[/itex]α[itex]_{2}[/itex]

but a[itex]_{2}[/itex] = a[itex]_{1}[/itex]

therefore a[itex]_{1}[/itex] = r[itex]_{2}[/itex]α[itex]_{2}[/itex]

i.e. α[itex]_{2}[/itex] = [itex]\frac{a_{1}}{r_{2}}[/itex]

Then how did r2 become r2 ^ (2)?
 
As Doc Al told you.

The denomenator of a denomenator is a numerator.
 
Whoops I thought the alpha was a regular a.

Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K