Inertia block on inclined surface problem? help with solution?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 2K views
nchin
Messages
172
Reaction score
0
A wheel of radius 0.20 m is mounted on a frictionless horizontal axis. A massless cord wrapped around the wheel is attaches to a 2.0 kg block that slides on a horizontal frictionless surface inclined at angle θ = 20 degrees with the horizontal. The box accelerates down the surface at 2.0 m/s^(2). What is the rotational inertia of the wheel about the axle?

Solution and picture is on page 32-33
http://mrlee.dreamstation.com/apPhysics/lect/apPhysics_lec_10.pdf

I understand all the steps except the last one where

m1(gsinθ - a1)r2 / a1 / r2 = m1(gsinθ - a1)r2^(2) / a1

why did they divide the denominator a1 by r2? and how did the r2 in the numerator become r2^(2)??


thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Note that linear acceleration of the string wound round the pulley is the same as a[itex]_{1}[/itex] since the string is assumed that does not extend.

Now linear velocity = radius x angular velocity.

Similarly linear acceleration = radius x angular acceleration.

i.e. a[itex]_{2}[/itex] = r[itex]_{2}[/itex]α[itex]_{2}[/itex]

but a[itex]_{2}[/itex] = a[itex]_{1}[/itex]

therefore a[itex]_{1}[/itex] = r[itex]_{2}[/itex]α[itex]_{2}[/itex]

i.e. α[itex]_{2}[/itex] = [itex]\frac{a_{1}}{r_{2}}[/itex]
 
nchin said:
and how did the r2 in the numerator become r2^(2)??
1/(1/x) = x

x/(1/x) = x^2
 
grzz said:
Note that linear acceleration of the string wound round the pulley is the same as a[itex]_{1}[/itex] since the string is assumed that does not extend.

Now linear velocity = radius x angular velocity.

Similarly linear acceleration = radius x angular acceleration.

i.e. a[itex]_{2}[/itex] = r[itex]_{2}[/itex]α[itex]_{2}[/itex]

but a[itex]_{2}[/itex] = a[itex]_{1}[/itex]

therefore a[itex]_{1}[/itex] = r[itex]_{2}[/itex]α[itex]_{2}[/itex]

i.e. α[itex]_{2}[/itex] = [itex]\frac{a_{1}}{r_{2}}[/itex]

Then how did r2 become r2 ^ (2)?
 
As Doc Al told you.

The denomenator of a denomenator is a numerator.
 
Whoops I thought the alpha was a regular a.

Thanks!