Inertia tensor of a body rotating about 3 axes

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The inertia tensor of a rigid body, such as a spacecraft, can be represented as a symmetric 3x3 matrix regardless of the axis of rotation. For a cube rotating about the x, y, and z axes, the inertia tensor remains unchanged in its structure; however, the relevant components depend on the specific axis of rotation. While the body cannot rotate simultaneously about all three axes, the angular velocity vector can have components in all three, indicating a complex rotational motion. Understanding the mass distribution within the body is crucial for accurately defining the inertia tensor.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of inertia tensor and mass moment of inertia
  • Familiarity with 3x3 matrix representation
  • Knowledge of angular momentum and angular velocity concepts
  • Basic principles of rigid body dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the inertia tensor for various shapes, including cubes and spheres
  • Learn about Euler's rotation equations for rigid bodies
  • Explore the concept of principal axes and diagonalization of the inertia tensor
  • Investigate the effects of changing mass distribution on the inertia tensor
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mechanical engineering, aerospace engineering, and physics who are involved in dynamics and kinematics of rigid bodies, particularly those working with spacecraft and complex rotational systems.

Sed
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hello,
I know about the inertia tensor about one axis, but how about a body that rotates around 3 axis x,y and z such as a spacecraft with changes in the attitude.

Thanks for you help.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you mean when you say, "How about a body that rotates around 3 axes ..."

The inertia tensor remains representable as a 3x3 matrix, just as before. For arbitrary axis orientations, the matrix is symmetric and full (no zero elements).
 
Hello, thank you for your response.

let's say we have a cube with coordinate frame at its centre. The body can rotate about z, y and x. In that case would the inertia tensor be different from the common inertia tensor of a cube that rotates only around z?

Thank you again
 
For a three dimensional rigid body, the mass moment of inertia tensor can be fully represented by a symmetric 3x3 matrix. If you look at the definition of each of the elements, they each depend only on the distribution of mass within the body. They do not depend on the axis of rotation; there may not be any axis of rotation defined.

If you now restrict rotation to one axis, most of the components of the inertia matrix become irrelevant, but that does not mean that they are changed. The just no longer contribute to the angular momentum or the kinetic energy.
 
The body can rotate about z, y and x.

It can't do that simultaneously, if that's what you're thinking. The body's angular momentum is represented by a vector--and that direction of that vector is the axis about which it rotates. The axis may not coincide with any of the coordinate axes, but it is a single axis.
 
Thank you all for your explanations. it is clear in my head now :)
 
John Park's statement is entirely correct, but I would like to add that the angular velocity vector can have components in all three axes. This can be understood as saying that it is rotating about all three axes simultaneously.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K