Inertial and Non-Inertial Reference Frames

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of inertial and non-inertial reference frames, particularly in the context of Earth's rotation. Participants explore definitions, implications of forces, and the validity of approximations in different scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant defines inertial frames as those that obey Newton's Law of Inertia and moves at constant velocity, while non-inertial frames are those that accelerate.
  • Another participant mentions that the Earth experiences gravitational forces and fictitious forces due to its rotation, suggesting that these must be accounted for, indicating that Earth is not an inertial frame of reference.
  • A different participant asserts that rotating frames are not inertial, even at constant angular velocity, but acknowledges that for local and short experiments, the effects of Earth's rotation may be negligible, allowing for approximation as an inertial frame.
  • Another participant proposes a distinction between inertial and non-inertial coordinate systems, suggesting that an inertial coordinate system allows free particles to travel in straight lines, while non-inertial systems result in curved paths.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether Earth can be considered an inertial reference frame, with some arguing it cannot due to the effects of rotation and others suggesting that for practical purposes, it can be approximated as such in certain contexts. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these definitions.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about the effects of Earth's rotation and the definitions of inertial versus non-inertial frames. The varying interpretations of these concepts contribute to the complexity of the discussion.

SQLMAN
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi All
Physics newbie here...

Just a quick question regarding Inertial and Non-Inertial Reference Frames.
From what I understand:
Inertial = One that obeys Newton's Law of Inertia. Moves at constant velocity in one direction
Non-Inertial: One that accelerates.
Right?
So, I read somewhere that there is no possible way to have an Inertial reference frame on planet Earth because Earth rotates - Is this correct?
I figured (with my limited understanding) that because it's rotating at a constant velocity, it's inertial?
Where am I going wrong here?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You experience the Sun's gravitational force on Earth. You also experience the Coriolis effect and an apparent "centrifugal" force due to rotation of the Earth. These apparent forces (also called fictitious forces) must be accounted for while calculations are being made, so the Earth is not an inertial frame of reference as these "external" forces act any observer on the planet (although in most cases they are negligible, and we can approximate the Earth to an inertial reference frame).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: AlephNumbers
SQLMAN said:
because it's rotating at a constant velocity, it's inertial?
No. Rotating frames are not inertial, even at constant angular velocity:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotating_reference_frame

But for local and short experiments the effects of the Earth's rotation are often negligible compared to the effects you are interested in, so it's a valid approximation.
 
SQLMAN said:
Hi All
Physics newbie here...

Just a quick question regarding Inertial and Non-Inertial Reference Frames.
From what I understand:
Inertial = One that obeys Newton's Law of Inertia. Moves at constant velocity in one direction
Non-Inertial: One that accelerates

I think what's clearer is to talk about inertial vs. non-inertial coordinate systems, rather than frames. An inertial coordinate system is one where a free particle (one not acted on by any nongravitational force) travels in "straight lines". That is, if you plot [itex]x[/itex] versus [itex]t[/itex] on graph paper, you get a straight line (and similarly for [itex]y[/itex] and [itex]z[/itex]). In contrast, a noninertial coordinate system is one where the graph of the position of a particle as a function of time is a curve, rather than a straight line.

For example, in a rotating coordinate system, if you plot [itex]x[/itex] versus [itex]t[/itex], you don't get a straight line.[/QUOTE]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • · Replies 78 ·
3
Replies
78
Views
8K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K