Infinite index set in product topology

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of the product topology, specifically regarding the openness of sets formed by infinite index sets. The original poster is exploring why a product of open sets indexed by an infinite set cannot itself be open in the product topology.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are examining the implications of infinite intersections of open sets and questioning the conditions under which a product of open sets remains open. There are discussions about the definitions of basis elements in the product topology and the conditions required for a set to be considered open.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the nature of basis sets and the limitations of extending finite intersections to infinite cases. There is an acknowledgment of the need to clarify the definitions and properties of the product topology, with some participants expressing confusion and seeking further guidance.

Contextual Notes

There are references to textbook definitions and the specific conditions under which sets are considered to be in the basis of the topology. Participants are also grappling with the implications of using proper open subsets versus the entire space in their discussions.

pieterb
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let

[tex]Y := \prod_{i \in I} X_i[/tex]

Now assume [tex]U_i \subset X_i[/tex] to be open.

If we take i to be infinite, [tex]\prod_{i \in I} X_i[/tex] cannot be open. Why?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I can't quite get my head around how to approach this problem. A part of me says that the assumption that [tex]U = pr^-1(U_i) intersection ..[/tex] does not produce an open set. (because the theorem for topological spaces says that only a finite intersection of open spaces is open).

How would one go about proving this rigorously?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Show there is no open set U in the basis of the topology such that U is a subset of Y.
 
Have been sitting on this while doing the dishes, however no new insights. Am I in the right direction by thinking that the fact that U is defined by infinite intersections no longer guarantees it to be open?
 
pieterb said:
Have been sitting on this while doing the dishes, however no new insights. Am I in the right direction by thinking that the fact that U is defined by infinite intersections no longer guarantees it to be open?

The question isn't about intersections. The big Pi symbol doesn't mean intersection. What are the basis sets that define your product topology? Look it up.
 
Last edited:
According to my textbook, the following gives B, the collection of subsets that forms the basis.

[tex]\cap_{a i}^{n} pr^{-1}_{a i}(U_{a i}) = \left\{(x_{\alpha})_{\alpha \in A} \in Y | x_{a i} \in U_{a i} for all i = 1, ... , n\right\}[/tex]

Given [tex]a1,..,an \in A[/tex] and [tex]U_{a i}[/tex] open in [tex]X_{a i}[/tex]

I don't see why this cannot be extended towards infinity.
 
pieterb said:
According to my textbook, the following gives B, the collection of subsets that forms the basis.

[tex]\cap_{a i}^{n} pr^{-1}_{a i}(U_{a i}) = \left\{(x_{\alpha})_{\alpha \in A} \in Y | x_{a i} \in U_{a i} for all i = 1, ... , n\right\}[/tex]

Given [tex]a1,..,an \in A[/tex] and [tex]U_{a i}[/tex] open in [tex]X_{a i}[/tex]

I don't see why this cannot be extended towards infinity.

Here's what is maybe a clearer way to describe that. A set U is in the basis if it's given by
[tex] U = \prod_{i \in I} U_i[/tex]
where U_i is a open subset of X_i and U_i=X_i for ALL BUT A FINITE NUMBER of indices i. Your set is
[tex] \prod_{i \in I} U_i[/tex]
where U_i is a proper open subset of X_i. (At least that's what I'm guessing from the problem statement). So U_i isn't equal to X_i for ANY i. And, yes, putting it that way you can say the problem is the need to do an infinite number of intersections.
 
Last edited:
Wow, I was thinking in completely the wrong direction. Thanks so much for your assistance!
 
pieterb said:
Wow, I was thinking in completely the wrong direction. Thanks so much for your assistance!

So you see the problem? An infinite product of proper open subsets is too small to have any basis element contained in it.
 
I see the problem, currently trying formulate it in a neat way. Any tips?
 
  • #10
pieterb said:
I see the problem, currently trying formulate it in a neat way. Any tips?

Like said before. Take any U in the basis and show it cannot be contained in your set.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K