Infinite lines of charge on 3 corners of square

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving infinite lines of charge placed at three corners of a square, with the goal of determining the charge values needed to achieve a zero electric field at the fourth corner. The subject area includes electrostatics and electric fields.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the configuration of the charge lines and their implications for the electric field. Questions arise regarding the interpretation of the problem setup, particularly the nature of the charge distribution at the corners and how it affects the electric field at the designated point. Some participants discuss the relationship between the charges and the resulting electric fields, considering vector components and the need for cancellation of fields to achieve equilibrium.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the relationships between the charges and the electric fields they produce. Some have offered guidance on how to approach the problem, while others are questioning their assumptions and calculations. There appears to be a productive exchange of ideas, though no consensus has been reached on the final values of the charges.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential confusion regarding the depiction of the charge lines and their spatial orientation. There is also mention of differing interpretations of the problem setup, which may affect the calculations and assumptions being made.

accountkiller
Messages
118
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Infinite lines of charge are placed on three corners of a square of side 0.2 m, as shown in the figure (attached). If the linear charge density [itex]\lambda_{2}[/itex] = +1 uC/m, calculate the values of [itex]\lambda_{1}[/itex] and [itex]\lambda_{3}[/itex] so that the electric field at the fourth corner is 0.

Homework Equations


[itex]E = \int k\frac{dq}{r^{2}}[/itex]
[itex]E = E_{1} + E_{2} + E_{3}[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution


First question - the figure is confusing. If it's a LINE of charge, what does it mean that it's located at a corner i.e. POINT? There are four lines in the square.. which 3 are the 3 line charges the question is talking about... i.e. what exactly is the picture depicting?
Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • Capture.JPG
    Capture.JPG
    2.5 KB · Views: 494
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Suppose that the square lies in the xy-plane. Then the line charges are parallel to the z-axis and pass through the xy-plane.
 
SammyS said:
Suppose that the square lies in the xy-plane. Then the line charges are parallel to the z-axis and pass through the xy-plane.

So the dots depicted in the corners of the square are just the ends of a cylinder, the rest is going into the plane so as to not be seen? So the lines connecting the dots are just there for reference, nothing actually connecting them?
 
mbradar2 said:
So the dots depicted in the corners of the square are just the ends of a cylinder, the rest is going into the plane so as to not be seen? So the lines connecting the dots are just there for reference, nothing actually connecting them?
The lines connecting the dots merely indicate the edges of the square, nothing is there. The lines of charge extend from -∞ to +∞ in the z direction.
 
Okay, so related to the post above but a different question... this one is the same diagram, except the corners just have charges, not inward cylindrical lines of charge.

There is a square, with charges at all corners except for the top-right one. The top-left corner is Q1, the bottom-left corner is Q2 = +1 μC, and the bottom-right corner is Q3. The sides of the square are 0.2 m. The top-right corner is just called point P, and the question asks to calculate Q1 and Q3 so that the electric field at point P is 0.

So, my attempts:
At point P, the E field due to Q2 points away in the 45-degree direction (since it's a square).
For the net field at point P to be 0, there would have to be an equal E field in the direction opposite of the one due to Q2. So, looking at point P, if I have the E field due to Q1 pointing left and the E field due to Q3 pointing down, the resultant vector from those two E field vectors would point in the direction opposite of the one due to Q2 and so could cancel it out. So that means Q1 and Q3 are negative charges. For my question, the net field due to Q1 and Q3 would have to equal the E field due to Q2. So E13 = E2.

Is that okay to say?

Also, the signs of E have me a bit confused. If I choose my coordinate system as point P being the origin, the E field due to Q3 would then point down, so should I make the value of that E field negative? I'm not sure of how to properly use the signs.
 
Last edited:
Net Vertical E Field:
EPy = -E3 + E2y

E2y = E2 cos(45)
E2 = k Q2/d2 = k Q2/sqrt(2*0.22) = 32,143 N/C N/C​

EPy = -E3 + 22,728 N/C

Net Horizontal E Field:
EPx = -E1 + E2x

Since the angle is 45 degrees, E2x = E2y

EPx = -E1 + 22728 N/C

Net Field Due to Q1 and Q3
-E2 = E13
-32143 N/C = sqrt(E12 + E22)

[itex]-32143 = \sqrt{(\frac{kQ1}{0.2^2})^2 + (\frac{kQ3}{0.2^2})^2}[/itex] k/0.22 = 2.25E11
[itex]-32143 = \sqrt{((2.25E11)Q1)^2 + ((2.25E11)Q3)^2}[/itex]

Then what? In similar problems online, the two charges end up being equal. But if I assume that here, then Q ends up equaling 0.03... where did I go wrong?
 
Last edited:
The field due to Q1 has to cancel the x component of the field (at P) due to Q2.

Like-wise, the field due to Q3 has to cancel the y component of the field due to Q2.
 
Wow, I way overcomplicated it.
Thanks for the clarification.
So then all I have to do is find the x and y components of E2, which I can do because I'm given the value of charge Q2 and can figure out the diagonal distance because I'm given the sides of the square. Since the angle is 45 degrees, both x and y components end up being equal though.

So then my charge Q1 and Q3 are equal, both negative charges of 1 * 10-7.
Correct?
 
Last edited:
Just doing the calculation in my head, I think Q1 & Q3 should be 1/4 of the magnitude of Q2, and be negative, of course.
 
  • #10
Oh, I just had a math error. My final result is -3.6E-7 for Q1 and Q3, which is close to 1/4th of Q2 like you said. So all must be well. Thanks so much for helping :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
64
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K